COVCF
Price
$15.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
INTU
Price
$706.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COVCF vs INTU

Header iconCOVCF vs INTU Comparison
Open Charts COVCF vs INTUBanner chart's image
COVER
Price$15.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Intuit
Price$706.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.47M
CapitalizationN/A
COVCF vs INTU Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COVCF vs. INTU commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COVCF is a Hold and INTU is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (COVCF: $15.60 vs. INTU: $706.25)
Brand notoriety: COVCF: Not notable vs. INTU: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COVCF: 6% vs. INTU: 110%
Market capitalization -- COVCF: $1.06B vs. INTU: $179.12B
COVCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.06B. INTU’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $179.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COVCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINTU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COVCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • INTU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTU is a better buy in the long-term than COVCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • INTU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

COVCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +10.29% price change this week, while INTU (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTU($179B) has a higher market cap than COVCF($1.06B). COVCF (66.67) and INTU (65.35) have similar P/E ratio . INTU YTD gains are higher at: 13.670 vs. COVCF (-19.211). INTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.37B vs. COVCF (3.53B). COVCF has higher revenues than INTU: COVCF (20.5B) vs INTU (15.1B).
COVCFINTUCOVCF / INTU
Capitalization1.06B179B1%
EBITDA3.53B4.37B81%
Gain YTD-19.21113.670-141%
P/E Ratio66.6765.35102%
Revenue20.5B15.1B136%
Total CashN/A1.49B-
Total DebtN/A6.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
INTU: Fundamental Ratings
INTU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEYS37.600.38
+1.01%
Weyco Group
FKWL4.400.01
+0.23%
Franklin Wireless Corp
DOW44.99-0.05
-0.11%
Dow
BMI223.70-1.32
-0.59%
Badger Meter
PMT13.11-0.09
-0.68%
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust

COVCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COVCF and NRDY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COVCF and NRDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COVCF
1D Price
Change %
COVCF100%
+3.52%
NRDY - COVCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.97%
VRNT - COVCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
FIVN - COVCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
INTU - COVCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
RPAY - COVCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More

INTU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTU
1D Price
Change %
INTU100%
+0.97%
CLSK - INTU
65%
Loosely correlated
-15.03%
COIN - INTU
64%
Loosely correlated
-10.78%
ADSK - INTU
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
RIOT - INTU
60%
Loosely correlated
-12.39%
NOW - INTU
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More