Advertisement
COWG vs KLAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSBA | 21.57 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Return Stacked Bonds & Mrg Arbtrg ETF | |||
| FBND | 46.35 | 0.06 | +0.13% |
| Fidelity Total Bond ETF | |||
| GWX | 38.27 | -0.46 | -1.18% |
| SPDR® S&P® International Small Cap ETF | |||
| BDEC | 47.15 | -0.69 | -1.45% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Dec | |||
| SPXV | 71.11 | -1.16 | -1.60% |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | -2.36% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -4.14% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | -5.57% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -5.57% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | -6.19% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 89% Closely correlated | -6.15% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | -5.61% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | -3.93% | ||
More | ||||