| COWZ | LSAT | COWZ / LSAT | |
| Gain YTD | 8.548 | 10.768 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 61.5M | 30,244% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.99 | 49% |
| Turnover | 151.00 | 189.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 1.99 | 1.73 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| COWZ | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EUFN | 38.44 | 0.15 | +0.39% |
| iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF | |||
| DCRE | 51.65 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| DoubleLine Commercial Real Estt Dbt ETF | |||
| FLCC | 35.66 | -0.04 | -0.12% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF | |||
| VGRO | 26.90 | -0.22 | -0.81% |
| VIRTUS SILVANT GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES ETF | |||
| TMFE | 29.80 | -0.37 | -1.22% |
| Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWZ | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| CE - COWZ | 74% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| DOW - COWZ | 72% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| APA - COWZ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| TRGP - COWZ | 70% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| WEX - COWZ | 66% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSAT has been loosely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSAT jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSAT | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| EQH - LSAT | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| EVR - LSAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| ALLY - LSAT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| LKQ - LSAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| LOW - LSAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||