COWZ
Price
$69.00
Change
-$0.73 (-1.05%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
22.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VFLO
Price
$53.00
Change
-$0.58 (-1.08%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
11.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COWZ vs VFLO

COWZ vs VFLO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) vs. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs employ rules-based strategies targeting U.S. large-cap companies with strong free cash flow (FCF) yields, but COWZ selects 100 holdings while VFLO narrows to approximately 50 with an added growth filter.
  • COWZ tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index from the Russell 1000 universe and carries a 0.49% expense ratio; VFLO follows the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index and features a lower 0.39% net expense ratio.
  • Sector exposures differ notably, with VFLO showing heavier allocations to Information Technology, Energy, and Health Care compared to COWZ’s broader diversification across value-oriented names.
  • COWZ offers greater diversification through more holdings and a longer track record since 2016, whereas VFLO, launched in 2023, emphasizes expected FCF and growth metrics for potentially tighter quality focus.
  • Both maintain passive, open-ended structures with quarterly rebalancing and physical replication, positioning them as cost-efficient vehicles for FCF-driven equity exposure rather than leveraged or thematic products.
  • Structural differences in holdings count, cost, and growth screening create distinct risk-return profiles suited to investors prioritizing breadth versus concentrated quality signals.

Introduction

Investors seeking U.S. large-cap equity exposure with a quality tilt often evaluate free cash flow (FCF) strategies. The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) both screen for high FCF yielders yet implement distinct rules-based methodologies. They do not compete directly as identical benchmarks but serve as alternative approaches within the same thematic space, allowing comparison of diversification, cost efficiency, and growth integration for similar investor objectives in the current market environment.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) Overview

The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, a rules-based benchmark that screens the Russell 1000 Index for the top 100 companies by trailing twelve-month free cash flow yield. It holds approximately 100 securities, primarily large-cap U.S. equities, with quarterly rebalancing and market-capitalization weighting subject to a 2% cap per security. Top holdings typically include names such as Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG), Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMY), and HCA Healthcare Inc. (HCA). Sector allocations span value-oriented areas including Health Care, Information Technology, Energy, and Consumer Discretionary. The ETF maintains a 0.49% expense ratio, operates as a passive open-ended fund, and provides full physical replication with quarterly distributions.

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) Overview

The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, which selects approximately 50 companies from a large- and mid-cap universe using expected free cash flow yield combined with a growth filter. It employs rules-based screening that incorporates both trailing and forward-looking FCF metrics, with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution. Top holdings often feature Adobe Inc. (ADBE), Expedia Group Inc. (EXPE), and Devon Energy Corp. (DVN). Sector weights emphasize Information Technology, Energy, and Health Care. The ETF carries a 0.39% net expense ratio, functions as a passive open-ended fund with physical replication, and distributes dividends monthly.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity space, focusing on companies demonstrating robust free cash flow generation amid evolving macroeconomic conditions. Key drivers include corporate earnings cycles, capital expenditure trends, and interest rate expectations that influence valuation multiples for cash-flow-strong names. Sector rotation toward value and quality factors, alongside commodity price movements in Energy and Materials, shapes the environment. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and capital allocation further affect FCF metrics, while broader market cycles reward or penalize high-yield cash flow screens relative to growth or broad-market benchmarks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, COWZ has delivered exposure through a wider set of holdings, resulting in smoother relative performance during sector rotations favoring diversified value. VFLO’s concentrated approach and growth overlay have positioned it for stronger responsiveness to earnings momentum in high-FCF names within Information Technology and Energy. Both have shown resilience in environments supporting free cash flow leadership, though VFLO’s lower cost and tighter selection may enhance relative positioning during periods of elevated volatility or shifting rate expectations. Differences in holdings breadth contribute to distinct volatility profiles, with COWZ offering broader diversification benefits.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest edge to VFLO due to its lower expense ratio, incorporation of forward-looking growth metrics, and concentrated holdings that align with recent sector momentum in high-FCF areas. COWZ remains competitive through superior diversification and established methodology. The probabilistic assessment favors VFLO’s cost efficiency and screening refinements for investors prioritizing quality signals within the free cash flow theme, though allocation decisions should reflect individual risk tolerance and portfolio construction needs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COWZ vs. VFLO commentary
Sep 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWZ is a Hold and VFLO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COWZ has more net assets: 22.8B vs. VFLO (11.1B). VFLO has a higher annual dividend yield than COWZ: VFLO (35.471) vs COWZ (15.924). COWZ was incepted earlier than VFLO: COWZ (10 years) vs VFLO (3 years). VFLO (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than COWZ (0.49). VFLO has a higher turnover COWZ (86.00) vs COWZ (86.00).
COWZVFLOCOWZ / VFLO
Gain YTD15.92435.47145%
Net Assets22.8B11.1B205%
Total Expense Ratio0.490.39126%
Turnover86.00149.0058%
Yield1.721.01170%
Fund Existence10 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COWZVFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
COWZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VFLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAOM31.32N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
TDSB24.77-0.04
-0.17%
ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF (TDSB)
POWA86.88-0.23
-0.27%
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA)
IMTM53.00-0.19
-0.36%
iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF (IMTM)
ECC3.63-0.04
-1.09%
Eagle Point Credit Company

COWZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWZ has been closely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWZ jumps, then CE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COWZ
1D Price
Change %
COWZ100%
-1.05%
CE - COWZ
74%
Closely correlated
-2.99%
DOW - COWZ
72%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
APA - COWZ
71%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
TRGP - COWZ
70%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
WEX - COWZ
66%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
More

VFLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFLO has been loosely correlated with ABNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFLO jumps, then ABNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFLO
1D Price
Change %
VFLO100%
-1.08%
ABNB - VFLO
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ALGN - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
DOCU - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
PAYX - VFLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
DOX - VFLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
More