CPAC
Price
$6.20
Change
+$0.09 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
523.15M
6 days until earnings call
HCMLY
Price
$26.32
Change
+$0.12 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs HCMLY

Header iconCPAC vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$6.20
Change+$0.09 (+1.47%)
Volume$9.77K
Capitalization523.15M
HOLCIM
Price$26.32
Change+$0.12 (+0.46%)
Volume$38.64K
Capitalization39.08B
CPAC vs HCMLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. HCMLY commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a Buy and HCMLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAC: $6.20 vs. HCMLY: $26.32)
Brand notoriety: CPAC and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 152% vs. HCMLY: 39%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $523.15M vs. HCMLY: $39.08B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $523.15M. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $39.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than CPAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLY.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.81% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +7.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.18% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($39.1B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($523M). CPAC has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: CPAC (11.27) vs HCMLY (10.41). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 42.029 vs. CPAC (18.547). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. CPAC (476M). HCMLY has more cash in the bank: 3.65B vs. CPAC (186M). HCMLY has higher revenues than CPAC: HCMLY (27.6B) vs CPAC (1.97B).
CPACHCMLYCPAC / HCMLY
Capitalization523M39.1B1%
EBITDA476M7.78B6%
Gain YTD18.54742.02944%
P/E Ratio11.2710.41108%
Revenue1.97B27.6B7%
Total Cash186M3.65B5%
Total Debt6.99MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
288
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
443
SMR RATING
1..100
5298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6423
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLY (13) in the null industry. This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAC (44) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (52) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (98) in the null industry. This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAC (49) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAC (64) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPACHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERB8.800.87
+10.97%
Verb Technology Company Inc
MBC12.060.66
+5.79%
MasterBrand
ARBK0.280.01
+4.14%
Argo Blockchain plc
GPRK7.240.14
+1.97%
Geopark Limited
DOC18.540.28
+1.53%
Healthpeak Properties

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
+1.47%
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
BCC - CPAC
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
CAPT - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+0.46%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
MLM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More