CPAC
Price
$12.01
Change
+$0.06 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CX
Price
$12.16
Change
-$0.42 (-3.34%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
17.55B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs CX

CPAC vs CX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. CX commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a StrongBuy and CX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CPAC: $12.01 vs. CX: $12.16)
Brand notoriety: CPAC: Not notable vs. CX: Notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 223% vs. CX: 74%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $1.03B vs. CX: $17.55B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.03B. CX’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $17.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $73.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +12.66% price change this week, while CX (@Construction Materials) price change was -6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

CX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.85% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($17.5B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($1.03B). CX has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: CX (36.46) vs CPAC (19.19). CPAC YTD gains are higher at: 15.259 vs. CX (6.308). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.75B vs. CPAC (425M). CX has more cash in the bank: 330M vs. CPAC (78.6M). CPAC has less debt than CX: CPAC (1.44B) vs CX (7.46B). CX has higher revenues than CPAC: CX (16.5B) vs CPAC (2.17B).
CPACCXCPAC / CX
Capitalization1.03B17.5B6%
EBITDA425M2.75B15%
Gain YTD15.2596.308242%
P/E Ratio19.1936.4653%
Revenue2.17B16.5B13%
Total Cash78.6M330M24%
Total Debt1.44B7.46B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs CX: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4613
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
357
SMR RATING
1..100
5989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
106
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (46). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (57). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (59) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (89). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (43). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (10). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPACCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VANI1.190.06
+5.31%
Vivani Medical
SLDP2.73-0.07
-2.50%
Solid Power
DD46.67-1.52
-3.15%
DuPont de Nemours
XPON0.46-0.02
-4.17%
Expion360 Inc
RUN12.81-0.81
-5.95%
Sunrun

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and JHX have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
+0.50%
JHX - CPAC
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
RETO - CPAC
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
CX - CPAC
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
EXP - CPAC
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
CRH - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with TTAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then TTAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-3.34%
TTAM - CX
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CRH - CX
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
MLM - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
VMC - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
EXP - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More