CPAC
Price
$6.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
99 days until earnings call
CX
Price
$5.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPAC vs CX

Header iconCPAC vs CX Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs CXBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$6.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.04K
CapitalizationN/A
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$5.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.87M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CPAC vs CX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CPAC vs. CX commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a StrongBuy and CX is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (CPAC: $6.29 vs. CX: $5.17)
Brand notoriety: CPAC: Not notable vs. CX: Notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 116% vs. CX: 82%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $523.15M vs. CX: $13.14B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $523.15M. CX’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $13.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.89% price change this week, while CX (@Construction Materials) price change was -5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

CX is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.50% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.1B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($523M). CX has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: CX (73.74) vs CPAC (11.27). CPAC YTD gains are higher at: 22.374 vs. CX (-32.842). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. CPAC (476M). CX has more cash in the bank: 533M vs. CPAC (186M). CPAC has less debt than CX: CPAC (6.99M) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than CPAC: CX (17B) vs CPAC (1.97B).
CPACCXCPAC / CX
Capitalization523M13.1B4%
EBITDA476M1.72B28%
Gain YTD22.374-32.842-68%
P/E Ratio11.2773.7415%
Revenue1.97B17B12%
Total Cash186M533M35%
Total Debt6.99M9.16B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs CX: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2551
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8175
SMR RATING
1..100
6084
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (19). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (81). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (60) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (84). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (83). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (49). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICHKX13.540.10
+0.74%
Guinness Atkinson China & Hong Kong
BSMIX16.890.06
+0.36%
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx Instl
FUNCX29.49N/A
N/A
Pioneer Fundamental Growth C
GSTTX13.19N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Inv
ACFGX67.75-0.29
-0.43%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr G

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
-3.68%
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
SUM - CPAC
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
JHX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More