99 days until earnings call

92 days until earnings call

Ad is loading...

CPAC vs SUM Comparison

Cementos Pacasmayo SAA

Price$6.29

Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)

Volume$9.04K

CapitalizationN/A

Summit Materials

Price$46.70

Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)

Volume$1.61M

CapitalizationN/A

View a ticker or compare two or three

VS

VS

CPAC vs SUM Comparison Chart

Loading...

Show more...

CPAC vs. SUM commentary

Nov 06, 2024

COMPARISON

Comparison

Nov 06, 2024

Stock price -- (**CPAC**: $6.29 vs. **SUM**: $46.70)

Brand notoriety: **CPAC** and **SUM** are both not notable

Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry

Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: **CPAC**: 116% vs. **SUM**: 118%

Market capitalization -- **CPAC**: $523.15M vs. **SUM**: $7.77B

CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $523.15M. SUM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $7.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

**CPAC**’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while**SUM**’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

**CPAC**’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.**SUM**’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

**SUM**’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

**SUM**’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

**CPAC** (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.89% price change this week, while **SUM** (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the **@Construction Materials** industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.39%.

**CPAC** is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

**SUM** is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES

FUNDAMENTALS

Fundamentals

SUM($7.77B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($523M). SUM has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: SUM (18.04) vs CPAC (11.27). CPAC (22.374) and SUM (21.425) have similar YTD gains . SUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 735M vs. CPAC (476M). SUM has more cash in the bank: 374M vs. CPAC (186M). CPAC has less debt than SUM: CPAC (6.99M) vs SUM (2.33B). SUM has higher revenues than CPAC: SUM (2.62B) vs CPAC (1.97B).

CPAC | SUM | CPAC / SUM | |

Capitalization | 523M | 7.77B | 7% |

EBITDA | 476M | 735M | 65% |

Gain YTD | 22.374 | 21.425 | 104% |

P/E Ratio | 11.27 | 18.04 | 62% |

Revenue | 1.97B | 2.62B | 75% |

Total Cash | 186M | 374M | 50% |

Total Debt | 6.99M | 2.33B | 0% |

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

CPAC vs SUM: Fundamental Ratings

CPAC | SUM | ||
---|---|---|---|

OUTLOOK RATING1..100 | 25 | 25 | |

VALUATIONovervalued / fair valued / undervalued1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |

PROFIT vs RISK RATING1..100 | 81 | 23 | |

SMR RATING1..100 | 60 | 83 | |

PRICE GROWTH RATING1..100 | 41 | 38 | |

P/E GROWTH RATING1..100 | 49 | 4 | |

SEASONALITY SCORE1..100 | n/a | 50 |

*Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.*

CPAC's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUM (88). This means that CPAC’s stock grew significantly faster than SUM’s over the last 12 months.

SUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAC (81). This means that SUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (60) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SUM (83). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to SUM’s over the last 12 months.

SUM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (41). This means that SUM’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

SUM's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAC (49). This means that SUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Technical Analysis

SUM | |
---|---|

RSIODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% |

StochasticODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |

MomentumODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |

MACDODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% |

TrendWeekODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% |

TrendMonthODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |

AdvancesODDS (%) | 5 days ago75% |

DeclinesODDS (%) | N/A |

BollingerBandsODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% |

AroonODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% |

View a ticker or compare two or three

VS

VS

Ad is loading...

Show more...

Interesting Tickers

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y

1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|

ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |

IBTO | 24.09 | 0.13 | +0.54% |

iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Trsy ETF | |||

FTGS | 31.05 | 0.14 | +0.45% |

First Trust Growth Strength ETF | |||

XHYE | 38.64 | 0.07 | +0.18% |

BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF | |||

IQHI | 26.62 | 0.02 | +0.07% |

NYLI MacKay ESG High Income ETF | |||

STIP | 100.52 | N/A | N/A |

iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF |

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y

Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|

CPAC | 100% | -3.68% | ||

HCMLY - CPAC | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||

USLM - CPAC | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.03% | ||

SUM - CPAC | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.36% | ||

CX - CPAC | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||

JHX - CPAC | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||

More |

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D

1W

1M

1Q

6M

1Y

5Y