Advertisement
CPAY vs XLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAY is a Hold and XLF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CPAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CPAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPAY (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.17% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.85% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CPAY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CPAY | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 19 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SLYV | 78.68 | 1.02 | +1.31% |
| SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | |||
| FMHI | 46.83 | 0.18 | +0.40% |
| First Trust Municipal High Income ETF | |||
| GNT | 6.45 | -0.01 | -0.15% |
| GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust | |||
| NCA | 8.43 | -0.03 | -0.35% |
| Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund | |||
| WEBS | 24.28 | -0.85 | -3.38% |
| Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Br 3X ETF | |||
CPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPAY has been loosely correlated with WEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPAY jumps, then WEX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAY | 100% | +1.75% | ||
| WEX - CPAY | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| SSNC - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| PTC - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| EEFT - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| ALIT - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
XLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLF | 100% | +1.26% | ||
| HBAN - XLF | 85% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| RF - XLF | 84% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| TFC - XLF | 83% Closely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| CFG - XLF | 82% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| CPAY - XLF | 81% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
More | ||||