Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPAYX vs RMFCX
CPAYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CPAYX vs RMFCX
CPAYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPAYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAYX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CPAYX (17.1M). CPAYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CPAYX (4.50) vs RMFCX (1.15). CPAYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CPAYX (3 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CPAYX (3.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CPAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.05 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPAYX: RMFCX (250) vs CPAYX (1000). CPAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.17 vs. RMFCX (9.09).
| CPAYX | RMFCX | CPAYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 0.91 | 351% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.495 | 9.496 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.50 | 1.15 | 391% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.17 | 9.09 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.36 | 33.16 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 37.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement