Advertisement
CPBI vs FBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPBI is a Hold and FBK is a Hold.
FBK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CPBI | FBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 7% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 47% | about 1 month ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPBI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CPBI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPBI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPBI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CPBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while FBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
FBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NDIV | 33.11 | 0.26 | +0.78% |
| Amplify Energy & Natural Resources Covered Call ETF (NDIV) | |||
| FTPA | 8.13 | 0.03 | +0.37% |
| Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) | |||
| TBUX | 49.64 | 0.07 | +0.14% |
| T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) | |||
| IQSM | 38.44 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLIM Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) | |||
| GNMX | 37.35 | -1.00 | -2.61% |
| Corgi Genomics & Precision Medicine ETF (GNMX) | |||
CPBI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPBI and NWFL have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPBI and NWFL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPBI | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| NWFL - CPBI | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| CTBI - CPBI | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
| FBK - CPBI | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CCNEP - CPBI | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CFBK - CPBI | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
FBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBK has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBK jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBK | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| UCB - FBK | 84% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| ABCB - FBK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| UBSI - FBK | 83% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| ASB - FBK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| HWC - FBK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||