Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.86
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$30.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and DHLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. CPCLX (1.14B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPCLX (2.83) vs DHLSX (2.08). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (21 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. DHLSX (3.41). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. DHLSX (29.91).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 11.164 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 1.95B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.08 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 3.41 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.28 | 18.30 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.85 | 29.91 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers