Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$27.74
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. CPCLX (1.03B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPCLX (3.06) vs DHLSX (2.24). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. DHLSX (-3.71). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 52.23 vs. DHLSX (30.73).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.441 | 1.953 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 1.93B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.06 | 2.24 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | -3.71 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.08 | 5.55 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.23 | 30.73 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...