Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.30
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$28.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.76B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. CPCLX (1.02B). DHLSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: DHLSX (2.02) vs CPCLX (0.90). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. DHLSX (41.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.99 vs. DHLSX (0.87). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 44.29 vs. DHLSX (12.08).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.257 | 3.353 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.76B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.99 | 0.87 | 343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.34 | 3.48 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.29 | 12.08 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...