Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$27.50
Change-$0.32 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. CPCLX (1.02B). DHLSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: DHLSX (2.02) vs CPCLX (0.90). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. DHLSX (41.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. DHLSX (4.66). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 39.56 vs. DHLSX (6.56).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.040 | 3.305 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.76B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 4.66 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.10 | 1.81 | 778% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.56 | 6.56 | 603% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.19 | - |