Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.34
Change-$0.10 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$27.87
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Hold and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. CPCLX (1.04B). DHLSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: DHLSX (2.02) vs CPCLX (0.90). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. DHLSX (41.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.56 vs. CPCLX (4.91). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 39.61 vs. DHLSX (8.41).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.522 | 2.690 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.68B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 2.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | 5.56 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.98 | -0.22 | -1,819% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.61 | 8.41 | 471% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...