Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.04
Change-$0.11 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets996.62M
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$26.75
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. CPCLX (997M). CPCLX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPCLX (3.09) vs DHLSX (2.21). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.03 vs. DHLSX (-5.89). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 51.53 vs. DHLSX (29.40).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.265 | -1.916 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 997M | 1.93B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 2.21 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.03 | -5.89 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.05 | -1.52 | -267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.53 | 29.40 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...