Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs DHLSX
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$28.97
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
CPCLX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. DHLSX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. CPCLX (1.08B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than DHLSX: CPCLX (2.95) vs DHLSX (2.15). CPCLX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPCLX (9 years) vs DHLSX (20 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPCLX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. DHLSX (0.89). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 44.57 vs. DHLSX (29.87).
| CPCLX | DHLSX | CPCLX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.46 | 218% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.148 | 7.296 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.89B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.15 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 0.89 | 816% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 18.50 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.57 | 29.87 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement