Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs NLSIX
CPCLX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.74
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.79B
CPCLX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPCLX (2.80) vs NLSIX (0.02). CPCLX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPCLX (9 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPCLX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). CPCLX (9.46) and NLSIX (9.02) have marching annual gain over last year. CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 53.57 vs. NLSIX (26.46).
| CPCLX | NLSIX | CPCLX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.986 | 6.613 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 7.79B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 0.02 | 13,599% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 9.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.35 | 21.98 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.57 | 26.46 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement