Ad is loading...
CPCLX vs NLSIX
CPCLX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
CPCLX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. NLSIX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a StrongBuy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. CPCLX (1.03B). CPCLX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPCLX (3.06) vs NLSIX (0.02). CPCLX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPCLX (9 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPCLX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. CPCLX (0.18). CPCLX return over 5 years is better than : 52.23 vs. NLSIX (32.79).
| CPCLX | NLSIX | CPCLX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.19 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.441 | 2.133 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 7.33B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.06 | 0.02 | 14,145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 7.25 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.08 | 17.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.23 | 32.79 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...