Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPEAX vs RGACX
CPEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CPEAX vs RGACX
CPEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CPEAX (130M). CPEAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CPEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CPEAX (15 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CPEAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CPEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPEAX: RGACX (250) vs CPEAX (2500). CPEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.38 vs. RGACX (3.68). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. CPEAX (7.77).
| CPEAX | RGACX | CPEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.93 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.93 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.182 | 6.959 | 319% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.38 | 3.68 | 364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.46 | 37.13 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.77 | 13.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.33 | 97.58 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers