CPF
Price
$26.68
Change
-$0.06 (-0.22%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
524.15M
62 days until earnings call
FMBH
Price
$35.16
Change
-$0.66 (-1.84%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
759.93M
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPF vs FMBH

Header iconCPF vs FMBH Comparison
Open Charts CPF vs FMBHBanner chart's image
Central Pacific Financial
Price$26.68
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
Volume$750
Capitalization524.15M
First Mid Bancshares
Price$35.16
Change-$0.66 (-1.84%)
Volume$636
Capitalization759.93M
CPF vs FMBH Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPF vs. FMBH commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPF is a Hold and FMBH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CPF: $26.74 vs. FMBH: $35.83)
Brand notoriety: CPF and FMBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPF: 82% vs. FMBH: 75%
Market capitalization -- CPF: $524.15M vs. FMBH: $759.93M
CPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $524.15M. FMBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $759.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMBH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMBH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPF is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMBH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMBH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the short-term than CPF.

Price Growth

CPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.34% price change this week, while FMBH (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.94% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($760M) has a higher market cap than CPF($524M). FMBH has higher P/E ratio than CPF: FMBH (10.10) vs CPF (8.93). FMBH YTD gains are higher at: -1.438 vs. CPF (-7.088). CPF has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. FMBH (16.1M). CPF has less debt than FMBH: CPF (187M) vs FMBH (409M). FMBH has higher revenues than CPF: FMBH (275M) vs CPF (247M).
CPFFMBHCPF / FMBH
Capitalization524M760M69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.088-1.438493%
P/E Ratio8.9310.1088%
Revenue247M275M90%
Total Cash109M16.1M677%
Total Debt187M409M46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPF vs FMBH: Fundamental Ratings
CPF
FMBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4052
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2550
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPF's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (95). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (52). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's SMR Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (100). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CPF (50). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to CPF’s over the last 12 months.

CPF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (50). This means that CPF’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPFFMBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBPTX46.74N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Tr
WPGTX18.54N/A
N/A
WPG Partners Small Cap Value Div Fund
SPEDX21.15N/A
N/A
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
AGFGX12.14N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Global Gr R5
NQQQX39.74N/A
N/A
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Institutional

CPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPF has been closely correlated with FCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPF jumps, then FCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPF
1D Price
Change %
CPF100%
-2.41%
FCF - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.86%
FFBC - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
FMBH - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.98%
HFWA - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-3.58%
HOPE - CPF
82%
Closely correlated
-3.30%
More

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-2.98%
CTBI - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
HOPE - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-3.30%
TCBK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
PEBO - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
BY - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-2.54%
More