Advertisement
CPHC vs VAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a Hold and VAC is a Buy.
CPHC | VAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VAC's Valuation (13) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPHC (90) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that VAC’s stock grew significantly faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
CPHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as VAC (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to VAC’s over the last 12 months.
CPHC's SMR Rating (90) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as VAC (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to VAC’s over the last 12 months.
VAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CPHC (54) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that VAC’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.
CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as VAC (35) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to VAC’s over the last 12 months.
| CPHC | VAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 57% | 18 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while VAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPHC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VAC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPHC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- VAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPHC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while VAC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
VAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.83% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MMID | 25.85 | 0.09 | +0.34% |
| MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) | |||
| ITM | 44.14 | 0.14 | +0.32% |
| VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) | |||
| ESGG | 237.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Northern Trust STOXX Global ESG Select ETF (ESGG) | |||
| VEFA | 81.12 | -0.81 | -0.99% |
| VanEck MSCI EAFE Analyst Sentiment ETF (VEFA) | |||
| EFNL | 52.52 | -0.81 | -1.52% |
| iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) | |||
CPHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPHC and DKNG have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPHC and DKNG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPHC | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| DKNG - CPHC | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| BALY - CPHC | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| HGV - CPHC | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| VAC - CPHC | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| MCRI - CPHC | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||
VAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VAC has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VAC jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAC | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| INSE - VAC | 61% Loosely correlated | +6.69% | ||
| HGV - VAC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| PENN - VAC | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ACEL - VAC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| DKNG - VAC | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||