Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSAX
CPLSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSAX
CPLSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.31B vs. CPLSX (1.08B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: CPLSX (1.38) vs NLSAX (0.00). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CPLSX (10 years) vs NLSAX (15 years). CPLSX (2.30) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.64). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CPLSX (5%) vs CPLSX (5%). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLSX: NLSAX (1000) vs CPLSX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.69 vs. CPLSX (-4.02). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.26 vs. NLSAX (12.84).
| CPLSX | NLSAX | CPLSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.64 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.64 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.566 | 0.558 | 281% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 7.31B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.02 | 2.69 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.00 | 19.59 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.26 | 12.84 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.22 | 53.85 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement