Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSIX
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.09
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. CPLSX (1.13B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPLSX (3.42) vs NLSIX (0.02). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPLSX (10 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). CPLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPLSX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. CPLSX (3.79). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 37.03 vs. NLSIX (22.56).
| CPLSX | NLSIX | CPLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.32 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.32 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.147 | 6.667 | 107% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 8.01B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 0.02 | 16,854% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 7.67 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.13 | 21.68 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.03 | 22.56 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.34 | - |