Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSIX
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. CPLSX (1.13B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPLSX (3.34) vs NLSIX (0.02). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPLSX (10 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). CPLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPLSX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. CPLSX (6.41). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.55 vs. NLSIX (23.90).
| CPLSX | NLSIX | CPLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.32 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.32 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.404 | 6.667 | 141% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 7.84B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 0.02 | 16,298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 7.67 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.58 | 24.59 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.55 | 23.90 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers