Ad is loading...
CPLSX vs NLSIX
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$16.21
Change-$0.09 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.17B
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.17B vs. CPLSX (1.03B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPLSX (1.56) vs NLSIX (0.63). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPLSX (9 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. NLSIX (54.00). CPLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPLSX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.01 vs. CPLSX (5.95). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.22 vs. NLSIX (27.71).
| CPLSX | NLSIX | CPLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.630 | 0.907 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 7.17B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.63 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 8.01 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.56 | 10.55 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.22 | 27.71 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers