CPNG
Price
$25.90
Change
+$1.39 (+5.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
110 days until earnings call
LQDT
Price
$25.27
Change
-$0.19 (-0.75%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPNG vs LQDT

Header iconCPNG vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts CPNG vs LQDTBanner chart's image
Coupang
Price$25.90
Change+$1.39 (+5.67%)
Volume$11.01M
CapitalizationN/A
Liquidity Services
Price$25.27
Change-$0.19 (-0.75%)
Volume$152.37K
CapitalizationN/A
CPNG vs LQDT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNG vs. LQDT commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNG is a StrongSell and LQDT is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (CPNG: $25.90 vs. LQDT: $25.28)
Brand notoriety: CPNG and LQDT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNG: 147% vs. LQDT: 148%
Market capitalization -- CPNG: $46.59B vs. LQDT: $771.86M
CPNG [@Internet Retail] is valued at $46.59B. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $771.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.25T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $41.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than CPNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than CPNG.

Price Growth

CPNG (@Internet Retail) experienced а +7.92% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was +5.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPNG is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+0.49% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNG($46.6B) has a higher market cap than LQDT($772M). CPNG has higher P/E ratio than LQDT: CPNG (45.53) vs LQDT (40.77). CPNG YTD gains are higher at: 59.975 vs. LQDT (46.891). CPNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 788M vs. LQDT (36.1M). CPNG has more cash in the bank: 5.54B vs. LQDT (137M). LQDT has less debt than CPNG: LQDT (15.4M) vs CPNG (3.72B). CPNG has higher revenues than LQDT: CPNG (27.2B) vs LQDT (336M).
CPNGLQDTCPNG / LQDT
Capitalization46.6B772M6,036%
EBITDA788M36.1M2,183%
Gain YTD59.97546.891128%
P/E Ratio45.5340.77112%
Revenue27.2B336M8,095%
Total Cash5.54B137M4,041%
Total Debt3.72B15.4M24,123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNGLQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PL3.000.37
+14.07%
Planet Labs PBC
TXNM45.950.21
+0.46%
TXNM Energy Inc
UGRO1.51N/A
N/A
urban-gro
TSQ9.83-0.02
-0.20%
Townsquare Media
OMC103.34-0.49
-0.47%
Omnicom Group

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with BYON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then BYON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
-0.71%
BYON - LQDT
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.67%
EBAY - LQDT
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
CVNA - LQDT
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
CPNG - LQDT
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.67%
SE - LQDT
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.50%
More