CPNG
Price
$24.82
Change
-$0.31 (-1.23%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
44.65B
3 days until earnings call
LQDT
Price
$34.31
Change
-$1.23 (-3.46%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPNG vs LQDT

Header iconCPNG vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts CPNG vs LQDTBanner chart's image
Coupang
Price$24.82
Change-$0.31 (-1.23%)
Volume$7.7M
Capitalization44.65B
Liquidity Services
Price$34.31
Change-$1.23 (-3.46%)
Volume$385.59K
Capitalization1.06B
CPNG vs LQDT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNG vs. LQDT commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNG is a Hold and LQDT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CPNG: $24.82 vs. LQDT: $34.31)
Brand notoriety: CPNG and LQDT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNG: 111% vs. LQDT: 113%
Market capitalization -- CPNG: $44.65B vs. LQDT: $1.07B
CPNG [@Internet Retail] is valued at $44.65B. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.3T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $44.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than CPNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than CPNG.

Price Growth

CPNG (@Internet Retail) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was -5.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPNG is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

LQDT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.33% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNG($44.6B) has a higher market cap than LQDT($1.07B). LQDT (45.75) and CPNG (43.63) have similar P/E ratio . CPNG YTD gains are higher at: 12.921 vs. LQDT (6.256). CPNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 870M vs. LQDT (40.6M). CPNG has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. LQDT (139M). LQDT has less debt than CPNG: LQDT (13.4M) vs CPNG (4.02B). CPNG has higher revenues than LQDT: CPNG (28.9B) vs LQDT (414M).
CPNGLQDTCPNG / LQDT
Capitalization44.6B1.07B4,188%
EBITDA870M40.6M2,143%
Gain YTD12.9216.256207%
P/E Ratio43.6345.7595%
Revenue28.9B414M6,981%
Total Cash5.82B139M4,188%
Total Debt4.02B13.4M30,007%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNGLQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CPNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQDT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUVX22.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US LowVolatility Idx
OGRIX34.49N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock Select R6
PRKCX7.45N/A
N/A
PGIM Real Estate Income C
MBGFX20.01N/A
N/A
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth R4
ARAGX10.07N/A
N/A
Aristotle Growth Equity A

CPNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPNG has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPNG jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNG
1D Price
Change %
CPNG100%
-1.23%
CVNA - CPNG
46%
Loosely correlated
-9.86%
MI - CPNG
33%
Loosely correlated
+6.94%
JTKWY - CPNG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
ZLNDY - CPNG
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
JMIA - CPNG
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
More

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with BYON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then BYON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
-3.46%
BYON - LQDT
42%
Loosely correlated
-11.06%
EBAY - LQDT
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CVNA - LQDT
36%
Loosely correlated
-9.86%
LOGC - LQDT
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
CPNG - LQDT
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More