Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPOAX vs RGACX
CPOAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CPOAX vs RGACX
CPOAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPOAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPOAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CPOAX (1.17B). CPOAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CPOAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CPOAX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). CPOAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). CPOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPOAX: RGACX (250) vs CPOAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.03 vs. CPOAX (-2.30). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.72 vs. CPOAX (-49.62).
| CPOAX | RGACX | CPOAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.93 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.93 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.475 | 5.165 | -48% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | 1.03 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.11 | 35.23 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.62 | 11.72 | -423% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.59 | 93.99 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers