Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPOAX vs RGAGX
CPOAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts CPOAX vs RGAGX
CPOAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPOAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPOAX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CPOAX (1.23B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than CPOAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs CPOAX (0.00). CPOAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: CPOAX (29 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). CPOAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). CPOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPOAX: RGAGX (250) vs CPOAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.02 vs. CPOAX (7.81). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.92 vs. CPOAX (-46.55).
| CPOAX | RGAGX | CPOAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.29 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.701 | 8.663 | 8% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 11.02 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.51 | 48.16 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.55 | 21.92 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.66 | 117.56 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement