Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPOAX vs RGAHX
CPOAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CPOAX vs RGAHX
CPOAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPOAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPOAX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. CPOAX (1.17B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than CPOAX: RGAHX (0.40) vs CPOAX (0.00). CPOAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CPOAX (29 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). CPOAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). CPOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPOAX: RGAHX (250) vs CPOAX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.06 vs. CPOAX (-7.92). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.85 vs. CPOAX (-47.78).
| CPOAX | RGAHX | CPOAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.44 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.44 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.322 | 7.408 | 31% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.92 | -2.06 | 384% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.84 | 42.09 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.78 | 11.85 | -403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.03 | 101.45 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement