Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPOAX vs RGEBX
CPOAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts CPOAX vs RGEBX
CPOAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPOAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPOAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CPOAX (1.17B). CPOAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . CPOAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: CPOAX (29 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). CPOAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). CPOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPOAX: RGEBX (250) vs CPOAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.78 vs. CPOAX (-2.30). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 10.60 vs. CPOAX (-49.62).
| CPOAX | RGEBX | CPOAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.08 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.08 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.475 | 5.087 | -49% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.30 | 0.78 | -297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.11 | 34.35 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.62 | 10.60 | -468% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.59 | 90.38 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement