CPSS
Price
$10.11
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
160.8M
26 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$31.89
Change
+$1.05 (+3.40%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
236.25M
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPSS vs RM

Header iconCPSS vs RM Comparison
Open Charts CPSS vs RMBanner chart's image
Consumer Portfolio Services
Price$10.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$200
Capitalization160.8M
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$31.89
Change+$1.05 (+3.40%)
Volume$41.73K
Capitalization236.25M
CPSS vs RM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPSS vs. RM commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPSS is a StrongBuy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CPSS: $10.10 vs. RM: $31.89)
Brand notoriety: CPSS and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPSS: 68% vs. RM: 82%
Market capitalization -- CPSS: $160.8M vs. RM: $236.25M
CPSS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $160.8M. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPSS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPSS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPSS is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPSS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPSS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPSS is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

CPSS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +10.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPSS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.48% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RM($236M) has a higher market cap than CPSS($161M). RM has higher P/E ratio than CPSS: RM (14.49) vs CPSS (4.23). RM YTD gains are higher at: -4.349 vs. CPSS (-6.998). RM has less debt than CPSS: RM (1.43B) vs CPSS (2.57B). RM has higher revenues than CPSS: RM (484M) vs CPSS (205M).
CPSSRMCPSS / RM
Capitalization161M236M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.998-4.349161%
P/E Ratio4.2314.4929%
Revenue205M484M42%
Total CashN/A7.41M-
Total Debt2.57B1.43B179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPSS vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
CPSS
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2529
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5367
SMR RATING
1..100
2113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1182
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPSS (78). This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPSS’s over the last 12 months.

CPSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (67). This means that CPSS’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CPSS (21). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to CPSS’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CPSS (50). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to CPSS’s over the last 12 months.

CPSS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for RM (82). This means that CPSS’s stock grew significantly faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSSRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIABF0.15N/A
N/A
CAPITAL A BERHAD
WHWRF0.05N/A
N/A
World Houseware
RMTO0.03N/A
N/A
RM2 International, Inc.
FANUY13.38-0.06
-0.45%
Fanuc Corporation
ADRZY14.56-0.55
-3.67%
Andritz AG

CPSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPSS has been loosely correlated with UPBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPSS jumps, then UPBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPSS
1D Price
Change %
CPSS100%
+0.10%
UPBD - CPSS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
BBDC - CPSS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
ATLC - CPSS
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
ECPG - CPSS
36%
Loosely correlated
+5.68%
RM - CPSS
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.40%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ATLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ATLC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
+3.40%
ATLC - RM
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
ENVA - RM
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
SYF - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
AXP - RM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
COF - RM
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
More