CQP
Price
$53.98
Change
-$0.08 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.13B
54 days until earnings call
LNG
Price
$235.78
Change
-$1.19 (-0.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
51.82B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs LNG

Header iconCQP vs LNG Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs LNGBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$53.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.15%)
Volume$88.28K
Capitalization26.13B
Cheniere Energy
Price$235.78
Change-$1.19 (-0.50%)
Volume$1.82M
Capitalization51.82B
CQP vs LNG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. LNG commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and LNG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $53.98 vs. LNG: $235.78)
Brand notoriety: CQP: Not notable vs. LNG: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 73% vs. LNG: 97%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $26.13B vs. LNG: $51.82B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $26.13B. LNG’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $51.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than LNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LNG is a better buy in the short-term than CQP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

LNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.25% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNG($51.8B) has a higher market cap than CQP($26.1B). LNG (13.80) and CQP (13.15) have similar P/E ratio . LNG YTD gains are higher at: 10.450 vs. CQP (6.049). LNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.3B vs. CQP (3.91B). LNG has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. CQP (108M). CQP has less debt than LNG: CQP (14.8B) vs LNG (25.4B). LNG has higher revenues than CQP: LNG (18.3B) vs CQP (9.96B).
CQPLNGCQP / LNG
Capitalization26.1B51.8B50%
EBITDA3.91B8.3B47%
Gain YTD6.04910.45058%
P/E Ratio13.1513.8095%
Revenue9.96B18.3B54%
Total Cash108M1.65B7%
Total Debt14.8B25.4B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs LNG: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
LNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
459
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
258
SMR RATING
1..100
1016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CQP's Valuation (54) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNG (89). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNG’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (25). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (16). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (61). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (25). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCD115.130.37
+0.32%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discret ETF
LDSF19.150.05
+0.24%
First Trust Low Dur Strat Foc ETF
ISTB48.850.09
+0.18%
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
IBHE23.16N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds 2025 Term HY and Inc ETF
LFAF121.60N/A
N/A
LifeX 2049 Longevity Income ETF

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-0.15%
LNG - CQP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
GLP - CQP
66%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
HESM - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
OKE - CQP
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
MPLX - CQP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More