CQP
Price
$58.62
Change
-$5.61 (-8.73%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.91B
27 days until earnings call
LNG
Price
$197.79
Change
-$22.28 (-10.12%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.85B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CQP vs LNG

Header iconCQP vs LNG Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs LNGBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$58.62
Change-$5.61 (-8.73%)
Volume$106
Capitalization23.91B
Cheniere Energy
Price$197.79
Change-$22.28 (-10.12%)
Volume$3.97K
Capitalization37.85B
CQP vs LNG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. LNG commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Hold and LNG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $64.23 vs. LNG: $220.07)
Brand notoriety: CQP: Not notable vs. LNG: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 96% vs. LNG: 134%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $23.91B vs. LNG: $37.85B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $23.91B. LNG’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $37.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CQP and LNG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the short-term than LNG.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -8.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

LNG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-8.55% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNG($37.9B) has a higher market cap than CQP($23.9B). CQP has higher P/E ratio than LNG: CQP (7.11) vs LNG (3.91). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 22.531 vs. LNG (2.655). LNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.9B vs. CQP (5.75B). LNG has more cash in the bank: 4.07B vs. CQP (575M). CQP has less debt than LNG: CQP (16B) vs LNG (26.8B). LNG has higher revenues than CQP: LNG (20.4B) vs CQP (9.66B).
CQPLNGCQP / LNG
Capitalization23.9B37.9B63%
EBITDA5.75B16.9B34%
Gain YTD22.5312.655849%
P/E Ratio7.113.91182%
Revenue9.66B20.4B47%
Total Cash575M4.07B14%
Total Debt16B26.8B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs LNG: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
LNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2269
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
1117
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNG's Valuation (73) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (84). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (7). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (17). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (41). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (7). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ONVO2.170.03
+1.40%
Organovo Holdings Inc
CSTL19.19-1.00
-4.95%
Castle Biosciences
SKYX1.08-0.09
-7.69%
SKYX Platforms Corp
TALO8.20-1.36
-14.23%
Talos Energy
RL197.89-38.46
-16.27%
Ralph Lauren Corp

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-5.53%
MPLX - CQP
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
LNG - CQP
51%
Loosely correlated
-6.20%
WES - CQP
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
GLP - CQP
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
HESM - CQP
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.13%
More