Advertisement
CQP vs LNG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Hold and LNG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- LNG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CQP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CQP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- LNG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
LNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.84% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| CQP | LNG | CQP / LNG | |
| Capitalization | 26.1B | 50.6B | 52% |
| EBITDA | 3.91B | 8.3B | 47% |
| Gain YTD | 6.108 | 7.808 | 78% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.14 | 13.47 | 98% |
| Revenue | 9.96B | 18.3B | 54% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.8B | 25.3B | 58% |
CQP | LNG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNG's Valuation (72) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (80). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
LNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (21). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's SMR Rating (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNG (95). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than LNG’s over the last 12 months.
LNG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (58). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
LNG's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (26). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
| CQP | LNG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
CQP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQP | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| LNG - CQP | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| GLP - CQP | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| HESM - CQP | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MPLX - CQP | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| OKE - CQP | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||
LNG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNG has been closely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNG jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.