Advertisement
LNG vs WMB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cheniere Energy (LNG) vs. Williams Companies (WMB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Cheniere Energy (LNG) has outperformed with 39% year-to-date (YTD) gains compared to Williams Companies' (WMB) 26% YTD rise, reflecting stronger momentum in LNG exports.
- WMB provides a higher dividend yield at 2.78% versus LNG's 0.82%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Both stocks benefit from natural gas demand, but LNG shows superior profitability with a 59% return on equity (ROE, a measure of profit per shareholder equity) versus WMB's 19%.
- Recent analyst upgrades highlight WMB's stability and LNG's growth potential amid global LNG supply dynamics.
- LNG trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E, stock price relative to earnings) ratio of 11 versus WMB's 35, suggesting better value on earnings.
Introduction
Cheniere Energy (LNG) and Williams Companies (WMB) represent key players in the natural gas infrastructure sector, with LNG focused on liquefied natural gas (LNG) production and export terminals, and WMB specializing in extensive pipeline transportation. This stock comparison is relevant for traders eyeing energy sector opportunities amid rising global LNG demand and steady domestic natural gas volumes. Investors balancing growth potential against income stability, or assessing relative performance in recent market activity, will find insights into momentum, valuations, and sector tailwinds here.
LNG Overview and Recent Performance
Cheniere Energy (LNG) is a leading U.S. LNG infrastructure company, owning and operating major terminals like Sabine Pass and Corpus Christi, along with supporting pipelines. In recent market activity, LNG shares have shown strength, trading around $270 within a 52-week range of $186-$301, with a market cap of about $57 billion. Year-to-date gains exceed 39%, outpacing broader energy indices, driven by global LNG supply tightness from Middle East tensions and robust earnings growth expectations (135% quarterly EPS rise year-over-year). Analysts have raised price targets, with Scotiabank and others citing contract wins and valuation appeal post-share price gains; average target nears $303. Sentiment remains positive on export demand, though high debt levels warrant monitoring.
WMB Overview and Recent Performance
The Williams Companies (WMB) operates an expansive network of over 30,000 miles of natural gas pipelines across key U.S. regions, supporting transmission, gathering, and processing. Recently, WMB shares hover near $75, in a 52-week range of $56-$77, with a larger market cap of $92 billion. YTD performance stands at 26%, with steady gains fueled by quarterly dividend hikes to $0.525 per share and Goldman Sachs' upgrade to Buy (target $82). Earnings growth is anticipated at 8% for Q1, backed by strong natural gas demand and LNG feedgas volumes. Positive sentiment stems from infrastructure expansions, though elevated P/E reflects growth pricing amid sector volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors like energy and semiconductors. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates spanning 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 4.5, with trade durations from 1 day to 49 days. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots yielding +96% returns at 63% win rates and energy-related ones spotting volatility trends. Traders can copy these high-performing, pattern-recognizing AIs tailored to current market conditions. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your risk tolerance and portfolio goals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Cheniere Energy (LNG) emphasizes LNG liquefaction and exports, capitalizing on international demand growth, while Williams Companies (WMB) focuses on midstream pipelines for domestic transport and processing, offering fee-based stability. Growth drivers differ: LNG leverages global contracts amid supply constraints, posting 12% revenue growth, versus WMB's 9% from volume expansions. Recent momentum favors LNG's 39% YTD surge over WMB's steadier 26%, though WMB edges 1-year returns. Risks include commodity price swings and high debt/equity ratios near 200% for both; LNG faces export volatility, WMB regulatory hurdles. Market sentiment tilts positive for both in natural gas positioning, with LNG's lower P/E signaling value versus WMB's dividend appeal.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward Cheniere Energy (LNG) based on superior recent trend consistency, elevated YTD performance, and catalysts from tightening global LNG markets. While Williams Companies (WMB) offers reliable dividends and pipeline stability, LNG's relative positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance in bullish natural gas scenarios.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LNG is a Buy and WMB is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LNG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LNG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- WMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WMB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -11.58% price change this week, while WMB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
LNG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
WMB is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.57% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| LNG | WMB | LNG / WMB | |
| Capitalization | 50.4B | 90.7B | 56% |
| EBITDA | 6.1B | 7.67B | 80% |
| Gain YTD | 24.438 | 24.295 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.73 | 32.54 | 125% |
| Revenue | 20.4B | 11.9B | 171% |
| Total Cash | 308M | 950M | 32% |
| Total Debt | 25.5B | 30.3B | 84% |
LNG | WMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WMB's Valuation (37) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNG (88). This means that WMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNG’s over the last 12 months.
WMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (15). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.
LNG's SMR Rating (31) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (43). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.
WMB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (56). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.
LNG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMB (43). This means that LNG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMB’s over the last 12 months.
| LNG | WMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FNY | 103.56 | 0.14 | +0.13% |
| First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| JHAC | 14.93 | N/A | N/A |
| JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | |||
| SYSB | 88.67 | -0.22 | -0.25% |
| iShares Systematic Bond ETF | |||
| PDI | 17.44 | -0.05 | -0.28% |
| PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | |||
| ROAM | 35.49 | -0.15 | -0.43% |
| Hartford Multifactor Emerging Mkts ETF | |||
LNG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNG has been loosely correlated with CQP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNG jumps, then CQP could also see price increases.
WMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMB has been closely correlated with AM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMB jumps, then AM could also see price increases.