It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CQP’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CQP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +4.26% price change this week, while NGL (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.81%.
CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
NGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
CQP | NGL | CQP / NGL | |
Capitalization | 23.9B | 769M | 3,108% |
EBITDA | 5.75B | 571M | 1,007% |
Gain YTD | 12.261 | -21.005 | -58% |
P/E Ratio | 7.11 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 9.66B | 7.38B | 131% |
Total Cash | 575M | 738K | 77,913% |
Total Debt | 16B | 2.79B | 574% |
CQP | NGL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NGL's Valuation (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (18). This means that NGL’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (100). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's SMR Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (96). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as NGL (59). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to NGL’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (85). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.
CQP | NGL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago60% | 17 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with ENLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then ENLC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CQP | 100% | +0.42% | ||
ENLC - CQP | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
GEL - CQP | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
PAA - CQP | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
ET - CQP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
PAGP - CQP | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NGL and CQP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGL and CQP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NGL | 100% | +1.62% | ||
CQP - NGL | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
DKL - NGL | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
HYTLF - NGL | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PAGP - NGL | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
PAA - NGL | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
More |