CQP
Price
$52.29
Change
-$2.46 (-4.49%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
64 days until earnings call
NGL
Price
$4.77
Change
-$0.04 (-0.83%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CQP vs NGL

Header iconCQP vs NGL Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs NGLBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$52.29
Change-$2.46 (-4.49%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NGL Energy Partners
Price$4.77
Change-$0.04 (-0.83%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CQP vs NGL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. NGL commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Buy and NGL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CQP: $54.75 vs. NGL: $4.81)
Brand notoriety: CQP and NGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 74% vs. NGL: 94%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $23.91B vs. NGL: $768.57M
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $23.91B. NGL’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $768.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than NGL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NGL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CQP and NGL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while NGL (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -5.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

NGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-5.30% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($23.9B) has a higher market cap than NGL($769M). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 17.835 vs. NGL (-13.645). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.75B vs. NGL (571M). CQP has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. NGL (738K). NGL has less debt than CQP: NGL (2.79B) vs CQP (16B). CQP has higher revenues than NGL: CQP (9.66B) vs NGL (7.38B).
CQPNGLCQP / NGL
Capitalization23.9B769M3,108%
EBITDA5.75B571M1,007%
Gain YTD17.835-13.645-131%
P/E Ratio7.11N/A-
Revenue9.66B7.38B131%
Total Cash575M738K77,913%
Total Debt16B2.79B574%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs NGL: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
NGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19100
SMR RATING
1..100
1097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NGL's Valuation (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (29). This means that NGL’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (100). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (97). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as NGL (55). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to NGL’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for NGL (83). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than NGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPNGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPQAX14.10N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income A
RSMMX10.65N/A
N/A
Victory RS Small Cap Equity Member
AICRX37.48-0.23
-0.62%
American Century Discplnd Cor Val R
MLNSX24.11-0.15
-0.62%
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr R6
NRGEX68.77-0.76
-1.09%
Neuberger Berman Genesis E

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-1.17%
PAA - CQP
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
ENLC - CQP
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
GEL - CQP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
ET - CQP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
KMI - CQP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More