CQP
Price
$63.55
Change
-$0.96 (-1.49%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.23B
114 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EPD
Price
$37.49
Change
+$0.12 (+0.32%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
80.7B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs EPD

CQP vs EPD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cheniere Energy Partners (CQP) vs. Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CQP is a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export play, while EPD is a diversified midstream energy infrastructure operator.
  • EPD offers a higher distribution yield (roughly 6%) than CQP (about 5.1%), and carries a consensus "Buy" analyst rating versus a "Sell" consensus for CQP.
  • CQP has posted stronger trailing and year-to-date price appreciation, but has been choppier in recent weeks after reaching its 52-week high.
  • EPD is far larger by market capitalization (near $80 billion versus about $31 billion) and generates substantially higher revenue across more business segments.
  • Both are structured as master limited partnerships (MLPs), making income yield and fee-based cash flow central to their investment cases.

Introduction

Investors evaluating energy infrastructure and export-linked income often encounter CQP (Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.) and EPD (Enterprise Products Partners L.P.) in the same screen. Both are Houston-headquartered MLPs (master limited partnerships, a tax-advantaged business structure common in energy pipelines) with substantial cash distributions, yet they occupy very different niches. CQP concentrates on a single strategic asset—the Sabine Pass LNG (liquefied natural gas) export terminal—while EPD operates one of the largest and most diversified midstream networks in North America. This stock comparison weighs their relative performance, market positioning, and risk profiles for income-focused and growth-oriented traders alike.

CQP Overview and Recent Performance

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. owns and operates the Sabine Pass LNG export terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, along with the Creole Trail Pipeline that connects the facility to broader natural gas infrastructure. As a subsidiary of Cheniere Energy, Inc., CQP generates revenue primarily from long-term LNG sales and regasification contracts with utilities, integrated energy companies, and trading firms.

In recent market activity, CQP has traded near the lower end of a range that reached a 52-week high above $71 before retreating. The units have delivered strong trailing returns—roughly 24% to 33% on a one-year total-return basis—yet shorter-term momentum has softened, with the price below its 50-day moving average in recent weeks. A relatively small public float contributes to choppy trading, and the analyst consensus skews toward "Sell," with an average price target near $60, reflecting valuation and LNG-demand considerations. A forward distribution yield of about 5.1% and a low beta (a measure of volatility versus the market) of roughly 0.33 remain key attributes for income investors.

EPD Overview and Recent Performance

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is one of North America's largest midstream energy companies, operating an integrated network of NGL (natural gas liquids) pipelines, crude oil pipelines, natural gas pipelines, and petrochemical and refined products services. Its scale is reflected in trailing revenue of roughly $58 billion and a market capitalization near $80 billion.

In recent quarters, EPD reported record processing, pipeline, and marine terminal volumes, supported by newly commissioned assets and firm U.S. export demand amid global supply disruptions. The partnership has approximately $5.3 billion of major growth projects under construction and generates distributable cash flow with a coverage ratio of about 1.8x (meaning cash flow exceeds distributions by a wide margin). Price performance has been steady rather than spectacular, with a year-to-date gain in the mid-teens and a roughly 6.1% yield. Analysts maintain a consensus "Buy" rating with an average target near $41, and EPD's beta of about 0.49 remains low, signaling comparatively stable trading.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a systematic edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI trading bots that are currently best suited to prevailing market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots spanning thousands of tickers, but only a subset earns placement in this featured section. These bots differ markedly in trading style, strategy, timeframe, historical performance, and the specific sets of tickers they monitor—from swing-trading models to longer-horizon trend followers. By surfacing the most timely and statistically relevant bots, the page helps investors filter a large universe of automated strategies down to those showing current strength. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are actively trading tickers like CQP and EPD right now.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core contrast between these two names is concentration versus diversification. CQP offers leveraged exposure to a single high-value export asset, which can amplify upside when global LNG demand strengthens but also concentrates operational and pricing risk. Its elevated debt-to-equity ratio—a reflection of MLP capital structure—and modest institutional ownership add to its idiosyncratic risk profile.

EPD, by contrast, spreads earnings across four major segments, cushioning it against weakness in any single commodity or basin. It trades at a comparable P/E (price-to-earnings) multiple but with a higher yield, a "Buy" consensus, and broader analyst coverage. On relative performance, CQP has outpaced EPD over one- and three-year horizons, while EPD has shown greater short-term stability and more diversified growth catalysts. Income investors may favor EPD's higher, well-covered distribution; growth-oriented traders may be drawn to CQP's export leverage and longer-term momentum—albeit with a more cautious analyst stance.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Weighing observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward EPD in the current environment. EPD combines a higher, more reliably covered distribution, a favorable analyst consensus, diversified cash-flow streams, and a visible pipeline of growth projects—attributes that tend to support trend consistency and stability. CQP retains stronger trailing momentum and attractive export exposure, but its recent pullback, single-asset concentration, and "Sell"-leaning consensus introduce greater near-term uncertainty. The outcome is probabilistic rather than definitive: EPD appears better positioned on stability and income quality, while CQP remains a higher-beta expression of LNG demand.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CQP vs. EPD commentary
Nov 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Buy and EPD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CQP with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

CQP's RSI Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for CQP moved out of oversold territory on October 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 14 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 13 of the 14 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CQP as a result. In 67 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CQP just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where CQP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 57 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.

Following a +3.19% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CQP advanced for three days, in 207 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 193 of 260 cases where CQP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 74%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

CQP moved below its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CQP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.

CQP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 42, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CQP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 62 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (41.415) is normal, around the industry mean (160.809). P/E Ratio (11.708) is within average values for comparable stocks, (7.393). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (5.049) is also within normal values, averaging (13.660). Dividend Yield (0.049) settles around the average of (149858533376.000) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.767) is also within normal values, averaging (4.657).

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for EPD with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

EPD in +5.06% Uptrend, growing for three consecutive days on October 29, 2026

Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where EPD advanced for three days, in 178 of 400 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 44%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPD as a result. In 37 of 91 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 41%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPD just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPD's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 19 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.

EPD moved above its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 112 of 364 cases where EPD Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 31%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for EPD moved out of overbought territory on October 30, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 18 of the 44 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 41%.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 30%.

EPD broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 3 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 42, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPD’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.664) is normal, around the industry mean (160.809). P/E Ratio (12.931) is within average values for comparable stocks, (7.393). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.302) is also within normal values, averaging (13.660). Dividend Yield (0.060) settles around the average of (149858533376.000) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.424) is also within normal values, averaging (4.657).

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs EPD: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
EPD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
153
SMR RATING
1..100
545
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6232
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EPD's Valuation (50) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (88). This means that EPD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

EPD's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (15). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (5) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPD (45). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPD’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as EPD (44). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to EPD’s over the last 12 months.

EPD's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (62). This means that EPD’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPEPD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CQP: $64.51 vs. EPD: $37.37)
Brand notoriety: CQP: Not notable vs. EPD: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 114% vs. EPD: 172%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $31.23B vs. EPD: $80.7B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $31.23B. EPD’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $80.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $32.88K to $109.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while EPD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EPD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPD is a better buy in the long-term than CQP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EPD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the short-term than EPD.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while EPD (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.

EPD is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.61% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EPD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with PAGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then PAGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-0.93%
PAGP - CQP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
GLP - CQP
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
EPD - CQP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
PAA - CQP
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
WES - CQP
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
More

EPD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPD has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPD jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPD
1D Price
Change %
EPD100%
+0.35%
PAA - EPD
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
PAGP - EPD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
OKE - EPD
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
ET - EPD
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
DKL - EPD
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBC496.0422.99
+4.86%
RBC Bearings
ZKIN1.580.03
+1.94%
ZK International Group Co Ltd
ACRS3.74-0.06
-1.58%
Aclaris Therapeutics
LIFE40.88-1.74
-4.08%
Ethos Technologies Inc.
SONM2.52-0.18
-6.67%
DNA X Inc.