Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FLCH
CQQQ vs FLCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$51.85
Change-$0.74 (-1.41%)
Volume$7.09K
Net Assets2.91B
Franklin FTSE China ETF
Price$24.53
Change-$0.20 (-0.81%)
Volume$358
Net Assets240.65M
CQQQ vs FLCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLCH commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and FLCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.91B vs. FLCH (241M). FLCH has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: FLCH (35.619) vs CQQQ (33.545). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs FLCH (8 years). FLCH (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover FLCH (9.30) vs FLCH (9.30).
| CQQQ | FLCH | CQQQ / FLCH | |
| Gain YTD | 33.545 | 35.619 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 241M | 1,208% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.19 | 342% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 9.30 | 462% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 2.40 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||
FLCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLCH has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLCH jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCH | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| JD - FLCH | 80% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BILI - FLCH | 78% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BIDU - FLCH | 75% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| HTHT - FLCH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| TCOM - FLCH | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||