Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FLCH
CQQQ vs FLCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$44.04
Change+$0.18 (+0.41%)
Volume$429
Net Assets1.01B
Franklin FTSE China ETF
Price$21.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Net Assets186.53M
CQQQ vs FLCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLCH commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and FLCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.01B vs. FLCH (187M). FLCH has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: FLCH (19.825) vs CQQQ (11.376). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs FLCH (8 years). FLCH (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover FLCH (9.30) vs FLCH (9.30).
| CQQQ | FLCH | CQQQ / FLCH | |
| Gain YTD | 11.376 | 19.825 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 187M | 542% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.19 | 342% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 9.30 | 462% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 2.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 15 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +3.18% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.16% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
More | ||||
FLCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLCH has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLCH jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCH | 100% | +2.87% | ||
| JD - FLCH | 80% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| BILI - FLCH | 78% Closely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| BIDU - FLCH | 75% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| BEKE - FLCH | 72% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| BZ - FLCH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
More | ||||