Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs KALL
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KALL
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$39.62
Change-$0.16 (-0.40%)
Volume$109.16K
Net Assets645.41M
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$20.08
Change-$0.14 (-0.69%)
Volume$713
Net Assets9.2M
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KALL commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and KALL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 645M vs. KALL (9.2M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than KALL: CQQQ (0.609) vs KALL (-2.195). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KALL: CQQQ (15 years) vs KALL (10 years). CQQQ has a higher turnover KALL (55.00) vs KALL (55.00).
| CQQQ | KALL | CQQQ / KALL | |
| Gain YTD | 0.609 | -2.195 | -28% |
| Net Assets | 645M | 9.2M | 7,011% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 55.00 | 105% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 3.41 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KALL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | 16 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 16 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 82% | 29 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 72% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -12.84% | ||
| DADA - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TME - KALL | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| ATHM - KALL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| TCOM - KALL | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||