Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs KALL
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KALL
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$40.55
Change-$0.31 (-0.76%)
Volume$204.28K
CapitalizationN/A
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$20.96
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
Volume$2.34K
CapitalizationN/A
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KALL commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Sell and KALL is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 723M vs. KALL (10.6M). KALL has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: KALL (15.107) vs CQQQ (12.796). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KALL: CQQQ (15 years) vs KALL (10 years). CQQQ has a higher turnover KALL (55.00) vs KALL (55.00).
| CQQQ | KALL | CQQQ / KALL | |
| Gain YTD | 12.796 | 15.107 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 723M | 10.6M | 6,821% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 55.00 | 105% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 3.41 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KALL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 71% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
More | ||||
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| TME - KALL | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ATHM - KALL | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
| TCOM - KALL | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||