Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs KALL
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KALL
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$41.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
Volume$182.33K
Net Assets950.29M
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$21.67
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
Volume$357
Net Assets9.82M
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KALL commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and KALL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 950M vs. KALL (9.82M). CQQQ (5.663) and KALL (5.536) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than KALL: CQQQ (15 years) vs KALL (10 years). KALL (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover KALL (4.00) vs KALL (4.00).
| CQQQ | KALL | CQQQ / KALL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.663 | 5.536 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 950M | 9.82M | 9,679% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 4.00 | 1,075% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 2.11 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
More | ||||
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 69% Closely correlated | +4.64% | ||
| BZ - KALL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| QFIN - KALL | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.84% | ||
| TME - KALL | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.36% | ||
More | ||||