Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs KALL
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KALL
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$49.45
Change+$1.42 (+2.96%)
Volume$1.17M
Net Assets1.01B
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
Price$22.87
Change+$0.25 (+1.11%)
Volume$3.67K
Net Assets10.4M
CQQQ vs KALL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KALL commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and KALL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.01B vs. KALL (10.4M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than KALL: CQQQ (25.571) vs KALL (11.397). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KALL: CQQQ (15 years) vs KALL (10 years). CQQQ has a higher turnover KALL (55.00) vs KALL (55.00).
| CQQQ | KALL | CQQQ / KALL | |
| Gain YTD | 25.571 | 11.397 | 224% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 10.4M | 9,673% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 55.00 | 105% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 3.41 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +2.96% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +3.21% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 73% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -7.71% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +12.08% | ||
More | ||||
KALL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALL has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALL jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALL | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| BEKE - KALL | 67% Closely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| TME - KALL | 53% Loosely correlated | +12.08% | ||
| NIO - KALL | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| ATHM - KALL | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| TCOM - KALL | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||