Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$44.04
Change+$0.18 (+0.41%)
Volume$429
Net Assets1.01B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$24.83
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
Volume$2.01K
Net Assets20.11M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and MCH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.01B vs. MCH (20.1M). MCH (11.894) and CQQQ (11.376) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 11.376 | 11.894 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 20.1M | 5,045% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 1.24 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +3.18% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +4.86% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +5.71% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.16% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +2.75% | ||
| QFIN - MCH | 62% Loosely correlated | +6.07% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.86% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||