Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$46.06
Change+$1.37 (+3.07%)
Volume$15.16K
Net Assets944.61M
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$24.21
Change+$0.39 (+1.64%)
Volume$413
Net Assets36.3M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and MCH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 945M vs. MCH (36.3M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: CQQQ (13.484) vs MCH (8.027). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (15 years) vs MCH (3 years). MCH (58.98) and CQQQ (58.00) have matching turnover.
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 13.484 | 8.027 | 168% |
| Net Assets | 945M | 36.3M | 2,603% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 58.98 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 1.65 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.95% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 74% Closely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -16.37% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -1.48% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | -7.19% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| TME - MCH | -4% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||