Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$59.42
Change-$0.23 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.38K
Net Assets2.82B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$30.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Volume$100
Net Assets24.5M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.83B vs. MCH (24.5M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: CQQQ (51.473) vs MCH (37.742). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 51.473 | 37.742 | 136% |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 24.5M | 11,531% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 0.95 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.45% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||