Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$39.23
Change-$0.40 (-1.01%)
Volume$2.53K
Net Assets912.95M
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$24.93
Change-$0.20 (-0.80%)
Volume$398
Net Assets133.18M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 913M vs. PGJ (133M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (0.635) vs PGJ (-3.711). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (15 years) vs PGJ (20 years). CQQQ (0.65) and PGJ (0.67) have comparable expense ratios . CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (38.00) vs PGJ (38.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 0.635 | -3.711 | -17% |
| Net Assets | 913M | 133M | 686% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 38.00 | 113% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 4.40 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 15 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +4.75% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 85% Closely correlated | +5.44% | ||
| WB - PGJ | 84% Closely correlated | +9.10% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 84% Closely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| BEKE - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | +6.81% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +6.82% | ||
More | ||||