Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$60.47
Change+$0.23 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.3M
Net Assets2.81B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$34.01
Change+$0.36 (+1.07%)
Volume$14.43K
Net Assets166.28M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.81B vs. PGJ (166M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (53.555) vs PGJ (33.234). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) and PGJ (0.67) have comparable expense ratios . CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 53.555 | 33.234 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 166M | 1,693% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 25.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 2.51 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 84% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 76% Closely correlated | +3.66% | ||
More | ||||