Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$51.70
Change-$0.89 (-1.69%)
Volume$175
Net Assets2.91B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$29.53
Change-$0.50 (-1.67%)
Volume$100
Net Assets143.74M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.91B vs. PGJ (144M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (33.545) vs PGJ (17.644). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than PGJ (0.70). CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 33.545 | 17.644 | 190% |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 144M | 2,022% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 25.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 2.62 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 73% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||