Ad is loading...
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$40.12
Change-$0.36 (-0.89%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$26.49
Change-$0.53 (-1.96%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and PGJ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 689M vs. PGJ (145M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (12.601) vs PGJ (9.119). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (15 years) vs PGJ (20 years). CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (24.00) vs PGJ (24.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 12.601 | 9.119 | 138% |
| Net Assets | 689M | 145M | 475% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 24.00 | 242% |
| Yield | 0.61 | 2.55 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +4.58% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 72% Closely correlated | +4.29% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.25% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +2.16% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 84% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 82% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| WB - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | +4.29% | ||
| BEKE - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| TCOM - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +2.83% | ||
More | ||||