Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$43.29
Change-$0.90 (-2.04%)
Volume$440
Net Assets1.1B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$28.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$479
Net Assets139.05M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Buy and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.1B vs. PGJ (139M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (12.214) vs PGJ (10.089). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) and PGJ (0.67) have comparable expense ratios . CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (38.00) vs PGJ (38.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 12.214 | 10.089 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 139M | 792% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 38.00 | 113% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 1.77 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 86% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| WB - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| BEKE - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||