CR
Price
$189.19
Change
-$1.79 (-0.94%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
10.89B
72 days until earnings call
FLS
Price
$52.62
Change
-$0.39 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CR vs FLS

Header iconCR vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts CR vs FLSBanner chart's image
Crane
Price$189.19
Change-$1.79 (-0.94%)
Volume$318.47K
Capitalization10.89B
Flowserve
Price$52.62
Change-$0.39 (-0.74%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization6.88B
CR vs FLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CR vs. FLS commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CR is a Hold and FLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CR: $189.19 vs. FLS: $52.62)
Brand notoriety: CR and FLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CR: 111% vs. FLS: 35%
Market capitalization -- CR: $10.89B vs. FLS: $6.88B
CR [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $10.89B. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CR is a better buy in the long-term than FLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than CR.

Price Growth

CR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CR is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

FLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.53% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CR($10.9B) has a higher market cap than FLS($6.88B). CR has higher P/E ratio than FLS: CR (36.66) vs FLS (23.81). CR YTD gains are higher at: 25.017 vs. FLS (-7.763). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 557M vs. CR (457M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 629M vs. CR (332M). CR has less debt than FLS: CR (60.3M) vs FLS (1.67B). FLS has higher revenues than CR: FLS (4.65B) vs CR (2.23B).
CRFLSCR / FLS
Capitalization10.9B6.88B158%
EBITDA457M557M82%
Gain YTD25.017-7.763-322%
P/E Ratio36.6623.81154%
Revenue2.23B4.65B48%
Total Cash332M629M53%
Total Debt60.3M1.67B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CR vs FLS: Fundamental Ratings
CR
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8383
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
943
SMR RATING
1..100
4357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (59) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CR (85) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to CR’s over the last 12 months.

CR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

CR's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CR’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

CR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CR’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

CR's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (54) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CR’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUDUSD0.65N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - United States Dollar
CNYJPY20.57N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Japan Yen
GBPJPY199.82N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Japan Yen
BOCT46.89-0.10
-0.21%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct
FNDB24.76-0.06
-0.24%
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-0.74%
ITT - FLS
80%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
DOV - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.59%
PH - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
GTLS - FLS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
EMR - FLS
76%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
More