Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. FLDFX (419M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.36) vs FLDFX (1.26). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. FLDFX (-1.62). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.10 vs. CRAZX (7.63).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.345 | 4.743 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 419M | 582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 1.26 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | -1.62 | -684% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.43 | 14.01 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.63 | 18.10 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.46 | 33.46 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement