Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.42B vs. FLDFX (414M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.45) vs FLDFX (1.30). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. FLDFX (-6.45). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.35 vs. CRAZX (13.11).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.666 | 2.651 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.42B | 414M | 585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 1.30 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | -6.45 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.29 | 13.43 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.11 | 23.35 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.45 | 29.62 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement