Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. FLDFX (399M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.51) vs FLDFX (1.34). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. FLDFX (-7.95). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.66 vs. CRAZX (9.98).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.154 | -1.843 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | 399M | 591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 1.34 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | -7.95 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.55 | 5.71 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.98 | 20.66 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.05 | 22.50 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers