Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. FLDFX (420M). FLDFX pays higher dividends than CRAZX: FLDFX (1.47) vs CRAZX (0.52). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLDFX (19 years). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 273.00 vs. CRAZX (199.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.99 vs. FLDFX (2.54). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.40 vs. CRAZX (3.08).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.784 | 3.203 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 420M | 590% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.47 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.99 | 2.54 | 432% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.65 | 5.28 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.08 | 11.40 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.14 | 30.90 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...