Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison
Open Charts CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. FLDFX (486M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.64) vs FLDFX (0.89). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. FLDFX (12.29). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.67 vs. CRAZX (7.96).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.47 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.47 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.026 | 7.440 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 486M | 529% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 0.89 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.62 | 12.29 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 22.10 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.96 | 10.67 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.77 | 52.05 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement