Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison
Open Charts CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. FLDFX (487M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.63) vs FLDFX (0.85). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.10 vs. FLDFX (15.48). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.97 vs. CRAZX (10.55).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.47 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.47 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.593 | 7.699 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 487M | 531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 0.85 | 309% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 15.48 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.36 | 25.66 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.55 | 11.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.97 | 57.87 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement