Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. FLMAX (1.04B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: CRAZX (2.36) vs FLMAX (1.20). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). FLMAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. FLMAX (-4.40). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.60 vs. CRAZX (6.84).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.444 | 8.957 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 1.04B | 237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 1.20 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | -4.40 | -207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.12 | 23.88 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.84 | 38.60 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement