Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. FLMAX (1.05B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: CRAZX (2.21) vs FLMAX (1.04). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). FLMAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. FLMAX (-6.37). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.72 vs. CRAZX (9.24).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.592 | 9.708 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 1.05B | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.04 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | -6.37 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.44 | 22.29 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.24 | 37.72 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement