Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.39B vs. FLMAX (929M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: CRAZX (2.50) vs FLMAX (1.30). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMAX (8 years). FLMAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. FLMAX (-9.60). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.75 vs. CRAZX (12.41).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.94 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.364 | -3.225 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 929M | 257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 1.30 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | -9.60 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | 2.01 | 323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.41 | 47.75 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...