Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. FLMAX (956M). FLMAX pays higher dividends than CRAZX: FLMAX (1.72) vs CRAZX (0.52). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMAX (8 years). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. CRAZX (199.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. FLMAX (5.08). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.44 vs. CRAZX (1.23).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.049 | 2.256 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 956M | 258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.72 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.81 | 5.08 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.91 | 5.94 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.23 | 23.44 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...