Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison
Open Charts CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. FLMAX (1.28B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: CRAZX (2.64) vs FLMAX (0.92). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLMAX (10 years). FLMAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 307.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX (14.62) and FLMAX (14.52) have marching annual gain over last year. FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.30 vs. CRAZX (7.96).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.97 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.97 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.026 | 9.961 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 1.28B | 200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 0.92 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.62 | 14.52 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.59 | 26.00 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.96 | 24.30 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement