Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.41B vs. FLMFX (970M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.45) vs FLMFX (1.03). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.26 vs. FLMFX (-9.38). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.51 vs. CRAZX (11.03).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.722 | 1.099 | 430% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.41B | 970M | 248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 1.03 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.26 | -9.38 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | 15.76 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.03 | 39.51 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.20 | 37.69 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers