Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.32B vs. FLMFX (885M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.50) vs FLMFX (1.06). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.90 vs. FLMFX (-11.12). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.32 vs. CRAZX (7.57).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.25 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.25 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.259 | -6.998 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 885M | 262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 1.06 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | -11.12 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.27 | 0.65 | 965% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.57 | 33.32 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.74 | 26.84 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers