Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.45B vs. FLMFX (1.02B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.36) vs FLMFX (0.89). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (190.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.84 vs. FLMFX (-2.41). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.48 vs. CRAZX (8.05).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.765 | 5.809 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 1.02B | 240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 0.89 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.84 | -2.41 | -450% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.65 | 17.88 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.05 | 37.48 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.57 | 47.78 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement