Ad is loading...
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. FLMFX (964M). FLMFX pays higher dividends than CRAZX: FLMFX (1.36) vs CRAZX (0.52). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 316.00 vs. CRAZX (199.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. FLMFX (4.38). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.87 vs. CRAZX (6.13).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.309 | 3.712 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 964M | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.36 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.70 | 4.38 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.99 | 7.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.13 | 27.87 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.63 | 48.00 | 39% |