Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison
Open Charts CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.59B vs. FLMFX (1.27B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.63) vs FLMFX (0.61). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLMFX (38 years). FLMFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 307.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). FLMFX (21.79) and CRAZX (21.18) have marching annual gain over last year. FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.99 vs. CRAZX (13.44).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.21 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.21 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.537 | 11.115 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 1.27B | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 0.61 | 428% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.18 | 21.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.42 | 32.85 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.44 | 26.99 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.52 | 85.30 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement