Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison
Open Charts CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. FLMFX (1.3B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.65) vs FLMFX (0.66). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLMFX (38 years). FLMFX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 307.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). FLMFX (15.92) and CRAZX (15.61) have marching annual gain over last year. FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.83 vs. CRAZX (8.41).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.21 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.21 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.215 | 11.070 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 1.3B | 198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 0.66 | 404% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.61 | 15.92 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.77 | 25.93 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.41 | 23.83 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.83 | 80.75 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement