CRBG
Price
$33.79
Change
-$0.45 (-1.31%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.2B
86 days until earnings call
FHI
Price
$53.73
Change
-$0.21 (-0.39%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.17B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRBG vs FHI

Header iconCRBG vs FHI Comparison
Open Charts CRBG vs FHIBanner chart's image
Corebridge Financial
Price$33.79
Change-$0.45 (-1.31%)
Volume$2.9M
Capitalization18.2B
Federated Hermes
Price$53.73
Change-$0.21 (-0.39%)
Volume$1.24M
Capitalization4.17B
CRBG vs FHI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRBG vs. FHI commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBG is a Hold and FHI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CRBG: $33.79 vs. FHI: $53.73)
Brand notoriety: CRBG and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRBG: 81% vs. FHI: 170%
Market capitalization -- CRBG: $18.2B vs. FHI: $4.17B
CRBG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $18.2B. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRBG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRBG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than CRBG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRBG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRBG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than CRBG.

Price Growth

CRBG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRBG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBG($18.2B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4.17B). CRBG has higher P/E ratio than FHI: CRBG (30.63) vs FHI (11.91). FHI YTD gains are higher at: 33.694 vs. CRBG (14.614). FHI has less debt than CRBG: FHI (459M) vs CRBG (12.3B). CRBG has higher revenues than FHI: CRBG (16.1B) vs FHI (1.68B).
CRBGFHICRBG / FHI
Capitalization18.2B4.17B437%
EBITDAN/A537M-
Gain YTD14.61433.69443%
P/E Ratio30.6311.91257%
Revenue16.1B1.68B957%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.3B459M2,680%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBGFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FHI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAE7.170.07
+0.99%
VOYA ASIA PACIFIC HIGH DIVIDEND EQUITY Income FUND
KROP10.760.07
+0.66%
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
CAPE32.190.08
+0.23%
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
WTV89.02-0.19
-0.21%
WisdomTree US Value ETF
INFO22.87-0.10
-0.44%
Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Lg Cp Cor ETF

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been loosely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
-0.39%
IVZ - FHI
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
CRBG - FHI
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
BAM - FHI
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
SEIC - FHI
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
STT - FHI
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
More