Advertisement
CRBG vs VINP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBG is a Buy and VINP is a Buy.
| CRBG | VINP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRBG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while VINP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRBG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VINP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRBG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRBG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VINP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRBG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.21% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRBG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
VINP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
CRBG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRBG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRBG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRBG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRBG | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| EQH - CRBG | 88% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| BN - CRBG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| PFG - CRBG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| BAM - CRBG | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| KKR - CRBG | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
VINP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VINP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VINP | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| PAX - VINP | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BN - VINP | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| BBUC - VINP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CRBG - VINP | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| BLK - VINP | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||