Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRBRX vs FSMAX
CRBRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CRBRX vs FSMAX
CRBRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRBRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBRX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CRBRX (2.75B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CRBRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CRBRX (0.00). CRBRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CRBRX (14 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CRBRX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CRBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). CRBRX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CRBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.26 vs. FSMAX (29.23). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. CRBRX (-5.60).
| CRBRX | FSMAX | CRBRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.04 | 2,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.163 | 15.427 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 42.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.26 | 29.23 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.59 | 73.83 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.60 | 33.65 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.56 | 153.47 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers