Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRBRX vs FSMAX
CRBRX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CRBRX vs FSMAX
CRBRX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRBRX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBRX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. CRBRX (2.46B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CRBRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CRBRX (0.00). CRBRX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CRBRX (14 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CRBRX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CRBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). CRBRX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. CRBRX (14.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. CRBRX (-16.12).
| CRBRX | FSMAX | CRBRX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.04 | 2,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.873 | 13.370 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 40.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.94 | 20.57 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.04 | 55.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.12 | 33.18 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.71 | 133.82 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers