Advertisement
CRDO vs KLAC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) vs. KLA Corporation (KLAC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRDO has delivered explosive growth with 34.53% YTD and 297.56% 1-year returns, driven by AI connectivity demand, but trades at a premium trailing P/E of 98.93.
- KLAC shows steadier strength at 42.80% YTD and 151.85% 1-year gains, supported by Q3 revenue of $3.42B and AI process control leadership, with a more reasonable P/E of 48.52.
- Both stocks benefit from semiconductor sector tailwinds amid AI infrastructure buildout, but CRDO's beta of 3.18 signals higher volatility versus KLAC's 1.50.
- CRDO boasts 201.50% quarterly revenue growth YoY on $1.07B TTM, while KLAC grows steadily at 11.50% on $13.1B TTM scale.
- Market caps differ sharply: CRDO at ~$33-35B vs. KLAC at ~$225-226B, reflecting maturity contrast.
- Recent analyst sentiment favors both, with CRDO average target $209 and KLAC $1,814.
Introduction
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and KLA Corporation (KLAC) operate in the semiconductor ecosystem, capitalizing on surging AI infrastructure demand. CRDO focuses on high-speed connectivity solutions essential for data centers, while KLAC leads in process control and yield management for chip manufacturing. This stock comparison suits traders eyeing relative performance in the semiconductor sector and investors assessing growth versus stability amid AI-driven market positioning. Recent momentum highlights trade-offs in volatility, valuation, and exposure to hyperscaler capex.
CRDO Overview and Recent Performance
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) provides high-speed connectivity solutions, including optical and electrical Ethernet, PCIe applications, active electrical cables, and SerDes (serializer/deserializer) chiplets for data infrastructure. Targeting hyperscalers and AI data centers, the company has seen robust demand in recent market activity. Shares have surged, posting 34.53% YTD and 297.56% over one year, with a market cap around $33-35B. Recent weeks featured sharp gains amid AI infrastructure news, including the $750M DustPhotonics acquisition for optical expansion and analyst upgrades, though valuation risks post-surge drew scrutiny. TTM revenue hit $1.07B with 201.50% quarterly growth YoY, fueling sentiment shifts toward growth potential despite a high trailing P/E of 98.93 and beta of 3.18 indicating volatility.
KLAC Overview and Recent Performance
KLA Corporation (KLAC) designs process control, metrology, and yield management solutions for semiconductor manufacturing, spanning wafer inspection, reticle metrology, and PCB inspection. Its tools enable advanced nodes critical for AI chips. In recent market activity, shares advanced 42.80% YTD and 151.85% over one year, with a $225-226B market cap reflecting established scale. Q3 FY2026 revenue reached $3.42B, beating estimates, with raised guidance and a $7B buyback boosting confidence amid AI capacity constraints. TTM revenue stands at $13.1B, up 11.50% quarterly YoY, supporting steady performance at a trailing P/E of 48.52 and beta of 1.50, though shares dipped post-earnings on tempered guidance versus peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers, spotlighting those best suited to current market conditions via AI/ML analysis. These virtual agents, double agents, and multi-agents employ diverse strategies like trend following, momentum, sector rotation, and risk-managed corridors (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss), across timeframes from 5min to 60min. Performance stats shine: annualized returns up to +169%, win rates 51-88%, profit factors 1.5-11.7, and low drawdowns. Semiconductor-focused bots excel, such as a 60min agent on KLAC, LRCX, AMAT at +94.8% annualized (63% win rate) and NVDA, AMD peers at +71.7%. Traders can explore these high-conviction signals for precise entry/exit in volatile semis. Visit Trending AI Robots to review live stats and copy top performers.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRDO and KLAC both ride AI demand but diverge in business models: CRDO's fabless connectivity targets data center bandwidth bottlenecks, while KLAC's equipment dominates chip fab yield optimization. Growth drivers contrast sharply—CRDO's 201% revenue surge versus KLAC's 11.5%—yielding higher momentum for CRDO but superior scale ($13B TTM revenue) for KLAC. Risk factors include CRDO's hyperscaler concentration and volatility (beta 3.18), offset by KLAC's diversification and buybacks amid geopolitical fab risks. Sector exposure aligns in semis/AI, but sentiment favors KLAC's stability (lower P/E, PEG 1.82) over CRDO's premium valuation trade-off.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI leans toward KLAC in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency, lower relative volatility, established catalysts like earnings beats and capital returns, and balanced positioning versus CRDO's richer valuation post-rally. While CRDO offers higher growth probability, KLAC's scale and stability edge out for probabilistic outperformance amid sector rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRDO is a Hold and KLAC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRDO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKLAC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- CRDO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KLAC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRDO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRDO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KLAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRDO (@Semiconductors) experienced а -8.67% price change this week, while KLAC (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRDO is expected to report earnings on Jun 01, 2026.
KLAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| CRDO | KLAC | CRDO / KLAC | |
| Capitalization | 31.8B | 236B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 350M | 6.06B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 19.654 | 48.687 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 94.60 | 51.10 | 185% |
| Revenue | 1.07B | 13.1B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 1.3B | 4.96B | 26% |
| Total Debt | 16.3M | 6.15B | 0% |
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRDO | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NQP | 12.03 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Pennsylvania Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| PSMJ | 33.37 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | |||
| PLYY | 10.12 | -0.03 | -0.33% |
| GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | |||
| SLYV | 100.26 | -1.43 | -1.41% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm CpValETF | |||
| GLGG | 10.28 | -1.83 | -15.10% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF | |||
CRDO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRDO has been loosely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRDO jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDO | 100% | -6.70% | ||
| AVGO - CRDO | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| ALAB - CRDO | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| CAMT - CRDO | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| AMBA - CRDO | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| KLAC - CRDO | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.68% | ||
More | ||||
KLAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | -4.68% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 85% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 84% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| NVMI - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | -8.44% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||