Advertisement
CRESY vs PAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a Buy and PAM is a Hold.
CRESY | PAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | 26 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRESY's Valuation (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAM (37) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAM’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CRESY (33) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to CRESY’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's SMR Rating (16) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAM (55) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as PAM (59) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to PAM’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CRESY (63) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to CRESY’s over the last 12 months.
| CRESY | PAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRESY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while PAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRESY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRESY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRESY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRESY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -10.78% price change this week, while PAM (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.98% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GXPT | 35.92 | 0.39 | +1.10% |
| Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) | |||
| YLDW | 25.03 | 0.11 | +0.45% |
| Westwood Enhanced Income Opportunity ETF (YLDW) | |||
| VRP | 23.71 | 0.07 | +0.30% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) | |||
| DJUL | 51.43 | 0.15 | +0.28% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) | |||
| CBTA | 24.78 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April | |||
CRESY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been closely correlated with PAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then PAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRESY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| PAM - CRESY | 71% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| IRS - CRESY | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| IEP - CRESY | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| IIIN - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| BOOM - CRESY | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
More | ||||