Advertisement
CRESY vs PAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a Buy and PAM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRESY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CRESY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRESY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRESY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- PAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRESY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while PAM (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-3.92% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| CRESY | PAM | CRESY / PAM | |
| Capitalization | 818M | 4.71B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 623B | 1.22B | 51,024% |
| Gain YTD | -15.519 | -5.739 | 270% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.45 | 10.11 | 54% |
| Revenue | 1.04T | 2.16B | 48,261% |
| Total Cash | 657B | 677M | 97,046% |
| Total Debt | 1.94T | 1.91B | 101,727% |
CRESY | PAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | 20 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRESY's Valuation (1) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAM (44) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAM’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CRESY (44) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to CRESY’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's SMR Rating (34) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as PAM (65) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to PAM’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CRESY (61) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that PAM’s stock grew similarly to CRESY’s over the last 12 months.
PAM's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Electric Utilities industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRESY (97) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that PAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CRESY’s over the last 12 months.
| CRESY | PAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 20 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 86% |
Advertisement
CRESY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been closely correlated with PAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then PAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRESY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| PAM - CRESY | 76% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| IRS - CRESY | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| IEP - CRESY | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| IIIN - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
| BOOM - CRESY | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
More | ||||
PAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAM has been closely correlated with CEPU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAM jumps, then CEPU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAM | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| CEPU - PAM | 83% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| CRESY - PAM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| EDN - PAM | 74% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| HE - PAM | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| ENIC - PAM | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
More | ||||