Advertisement
CRH vs ESGU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Hold and ESGU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CRH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -3.11% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
CRH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRH | ESGU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 67% | 15 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 13 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GII | 67.09 | 0.47 | +0.70% |
| SPDR® S&P® Global Infrastructure ETF | |||
| LVHI | 33.15 | 0.10 | +0.30% |
| Franklin Intl Low Volatility Hi Div ETF | |||
| EAOK | 26.02 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Cnsrv Allc ETF | |||
| NJUL | 64.16 | -0.04 | -0.06% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Bfr ETF Jul | |||
| DIG | 30.76 | -0.51 | -1.63% |
| ProShares Ultra Energy | |||
CRH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.
ESGU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESGU has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ESGU jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESGU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESGU | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| KKR - ESGU | 79% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| CRH - ESGU | 74% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CDNS - ESGU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| TT - ESGU | 71% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| SNPS - ESGU | 71% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
More | ||||