Advertisement
CRH vs MLM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CRH plc (CRH) vs. Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRH exhibits stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at +6.19% compared to MLM's +1.95%.
- CRH trades at a more attractive trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 21.17 versus MLM's 37.32.
- Both stocks operate in the cyclical building materials sector but CRH benefits from global diversification across 28 countries, while MLM focuses on high-growth U.S. markets.
- CRH's recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) growth of 45.8% significantly outpaces MLM's -5.1%.
- Analyst price targets suggest upside for both, with CRH at an average of $142.95 and MLM at $690.96.
Introduction
CRH plc and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) are prominent players in the building materials industry, specializing in aggregates, cement, and ready-mix concrete essential for infrastructure and construction projects. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors tracking sector peers amid ongoing infrastructure spending and economic recovery signals. Traders seeking relative performance insights or portfolio diversification in cyclical materials stocks will find value in evaluating their business models, recent momentum, and valuation metrics in the current market environment.
CRH Overview and Recent Performance
CRH plc, headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, is a global leader in building materials, operating across primary materials (aggregates, cement), products (concrete, asphalt), and building solutions in 28 countries. With a market capitalization of approximately $78 billion, the company reported trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue of $37.45 billion and a profit margin of 10.02%. In recent market activity, CRH shares have shown resilience, rising about 8.78% over the past month amid broader gains in the construction sector, though experiencing some pullbacks on market up days. Key influences include the completion of its London Stock Exchange delisting to streamline U.S.-focused trading, a $300 million share buyback program, and anticipation for Q1 2026 results, boosting sentiment through demonstrated capital return discipline and operational strength.
MLM Overview and Recent Performance
Martin Marietta Materials (MLM), a U.S.-based supplier of aggregates and heavy building materials, emphasizes high-growth Sun Belt and mountain regions with a vertically integrated model covering quarrying to ready-mix production. Its market cap stands at around $37 billion, with TTM revenue of $6.15 billion and a higher profit margin of 18.49%. Recent weeks have seen more tempered performance, with shares up approximately 5.11% monthly but down 11% post-earnings in prior periods, reflecting sector headwinds. Sentiment has been shaped by a new chief operating officer appointment, upcoming Q1 2026 earnings, and sustained demand from infrastructure projects, though valuation concerns and recent EPS contraction have tempered gains.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, including technical and fundamental analysis, with filters for timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts, volatility levels (low to high), and asset classes. Users can copy trade via Signal Agents (real-time alerts, no minimum balance), Virtual Agents (custom risk management), or Brokerage Agents. While specific win rates or profit factors vary by bot, the selection highlights those excelling in current market conditions, offering traders automated insights without manual monitoring. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots potentially suited for materials sector plays like CRH or MLM.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CRH and MLM thrive on infrastructure demand, but CRH's global scale contrasts with MLM's U.S.-centric focus on non-reproducible aggregates reserves in growth markets. Growth drivers include public spending and data center builds, yet CRH edges in recent momentum and quarterly revenue expansion (6.2% vs. 8.6%, balanced by superior EPS growth). Valuation favors CRH with lower P/E and PEG ratios (2.28 vs. 3.17), alongside higher return on equity (ROE, 15.68% vs. 10.16%). Risk factors are similar—cyclical exposure, debt levels (77% vs. 60% debt/equity)—but CRH's beta of 1.24 slightly exceeds MLM's 1.19. Market sentiment leans positive for both, with analyst upgrades, though CRH shows tighter valuation discipline.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models would currently favor CRH over MLM, driven by consistent recent momentum, superior valuation metrics, robust EPS growth, and diversified positioning amid infrastructure tailwinds. While MLM offers strong U.S. exposure, CRH's relative stability and catalysts like buybacks provide a probabilistic edge in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Buy and MLM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MLM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MLM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-0.39% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| CRH | MLM | CRH / MLM | |
| Capitalization | 74.3B | 36.6B | 203% |
| EBITDA | 7.81B | 2.09B | 374% |
| Gain YTD | -10.218 | -1.792 | 570% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.64 | 38.24 | 54% |
| Revenue | 38.1B | 6.35B | 600% |
| Total Cash | 3.24B | 273M | 1,187% |
| Total Debt | 20.4B | 5.69B | 359% |
CRH | MLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRH's Valuation (26) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (81). This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (33). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's SMR Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (53). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (47). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (44). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
| CRH | MLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 51% | 16 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
Advertisement
MLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.