Advertisement
CRH vs MLM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CRH plc (CRH) vs. Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRH and MLM operate in the cyclical building materials sector, with exposure to infrastructure and construction demand.
- CRH offers broader geographic diversification across 28 countries, while MLM maintains a concentrated U.S. market focus.
- Both companies are scheduled to report second-quarter 2026 results near the end of July, providing near-term catalysts for sentiment.
- Recent market activity shows CRH with stronger year-to-date total return compared to MLM, though both trade below earlier 2026 highs amid sector volatility.
- Valuation metrics indicate CRH trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings ratio than MLM, reflecting differences in growth profiles and market positioning.
- Risk factors for both include sensitivity to economic cycles, raw material costs, and interest rate environments affecting construction activity.
Introduction
CRH plc and Martin Marietta Materials represent two prominent players in the building materials industry, making them natural candidates for comparison by investors and traders seeking exposure to infrastructure and construction themes. Both companies supply aggregates, cement, and related products essential for roads, buildings, and other projects, yet they differ in scale, geography, and market emphasis. This analysis appeals to market participants evaluating relative performance, sector positioning, and risk-return profiles within a cyclical industry. Professional and retail investors monitoring macroeconomic influences on construction demand may find the comparison useful for portfolio allocation decisions.
CRH Overview and Recent Performance
CRH plc is a leading global provider of building materials, including aggregates, cement, ready-mixed concrete, and asphalt, with operations spanning approximately 28 countries and employing around 83,000 people. The company derives a substantial portion of its activity from North America alongside Europe and other regions. In recent weeks, CRH stock has traded in a range influenced by broader market sentiment toward cyclical sectors and anticipation of upcoming quarterly results. Year-to-date performance has outpaced some peers amid infrastructure spending trends, though the shares remain below their January 2026 peak. Sentiment has been shaped by reaffirmed guidance and ongoing demand for materials in transportation and utility projects, with investors assessing the company’s diversified revenue streams against economic uncertainties.
MLM Overview and Recent Performance
Martin Marietta Materials focuses primarily on aggregates, cement, and downstream products for construction and infrastructure applications within the United States. The company benefits from exposure to high-growth domestic markets and large-scale projects. Recent market activity has seen MLM shares fluctuate amid sector-wide pressures, including concerns over inflation and interest rates, with the stock trading below its February 2026 high. Year-to-date returns have been positive but more modest than certain comparables. Performance drivers include steady demand for materials in public works and private construction, tempered by cost pressures and macroeconomic signals. Investors have monitored volume trends and pricing power as key indicators of operational resilience ahead of the next earnings release.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a selection of top-performing AI trading bots from a much larger library of hundreds of bots that analyze and trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this curated section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker universes, with historical metrics often showing varied win rates, drawdowns, and returns depending on the specific model. This diversity allows users to explore options aligned with different risk tolerances and market views. For more details on current trending selections, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRH plc and Martin Marietta Materials share core exposure to the building materials sector but diverge in business model and market reach. CRH operates with greater international diversification, reducing reliance on any single economy, whereas MLM concentrates on U.S. infrastructure and construction, potentially offering higher sensitivity to domestic spending cycles. Growth drivers for both include public infrastructure initiatives, yet CRH benefits from additional revenue streams across multiple continents. Recent momentum has favored CRH on a year-to-date basis, though valuation metrics show CRH at a comparatively lower trailing price-to-earnings ratio. Risk factors encompass commodity price volatility and economic slowdowns affecting construction, with MLM facing more concentrated geographic exposure. Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism tied to earnings visibility and sector fundamentals for both names.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as geographic diversification, relative year-to-date performance consistency, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term momentum to CRH. The broader operational footprint may provide a buffer against localized demand fluctuations compared with the more domestically focused profile of MLM. This assessment remains probabilistic and contingent on upcoming data releases and broader market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Buy and MLM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.53% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -5.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-3.24% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| CRH | MLM | CRH / MLM | |
| Capitalization | 68.6B | 34.2B | 201% |
| EBITDA | 7.81B | 2.09B | 374% |
| Gain YTD | -17.110 | -8.318 | 206% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.06 | 35.70 | 53% |
| Revenue | 38.1B | 6.35B | 600% |
| Total Cash | 3.24B | 273M | 1,187% |
| Total Debt | 20.4B | 5.69B | 359% |
CRH | MLM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRH's Valuation (26) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (80). This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (37). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's SMR Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (53). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (59). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
MLM's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (57). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
| CRH | MLM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 57% |
Advertisement
CRH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
MLM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| VMC - MLM | 88% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| CRH - MLM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| EXP - MLM | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| TTAM - MLM | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| AMRZ - MLM | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||