CRH plc and Vulcan Materials Company represent two prominent players in the building materials industry, each tied to construction and infrastructure cycles. Investors and traders evaluating relative performance often compare these names to assess exposure to similar demand drivers while accounting for differences in business scope and geographic footprint. This comparison provides context for market participants seeking to understand how scale, recent corporate actions, and sector positioning influence stock behavior in the current environment. Both equities appeal to those monitoring macroeconomic trends in housing, public works, and materials pricing without overlapping identical risk profiles.
CRH plc is a global manufacturer and supplier of building materials used in construction projects, operating through a vertically integrated model across multiple regions. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected positive investor response to the June announcement of an approximately $8.5 billion acquisition of Arcosa, aimed at strengthening North American infrastructure exposure. Year-to-date returns have outpaced broader market benchmarks in several periods, with analyst consensus maintaining buy ratings and price targets above recent trading levels. Sentiment has been supported by reaffirmed full-year guidance and operational execution, though broader market volatility has produced periodic pullbacks. The company’s larger revenue base and international diversification provide a buffer relative to more regionally concentrated peers.
Vulcan Materials Company is a leading U.S. producer of construction aggregates, asphalt, and ready-mix concrete, with operations concentrated domestically. Recent market activity has featured portfolio refinement, including the exit from California ready-mixed concrete operations and acquisitions expanding aggregates presence in Texas and Colorado. The stock has posted modest year-to-date gains amid preparation for second-quarter 2026 earnings, with consensus expectations pointing to year-over-year EPS growth. Investor focus has centered on aggregates-led strategy execution and exposure to U.S. infrastructure projects, resulting in relatively stable but narrower momentum compared with some sector counterparts. Valuation multiples remain elevated, reflecting the company’s specialized market position.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent performance metrics, and suitable risk-adjusted statistics earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and historical statistics, allowing users to review detailed performance data before considering any automated approach. This resource provides an informational overview of how algorithmic tools evaluate securities such as CRH and VMC across varying market regimes. Review the page for additional details on current trending options.
CRH plc operates a diversified, global building-products platform, while Vulcan Materials Company maintains a more specialized focus on U.S. aggregates production. Growth drivers for both center on infrastructure spending, yet CRH benefits from broader geographic revenue streams and recent M&A activity that expands its North American footprint. VMC has emphasized operational concentration through selective divestitures and bolt-on acquisitions, sharpening its aggregates emphasis. Recent momentum favors CRH on a year-to-date basis, though VMC’s upcoming earnings release could influence short-term sentiment. Risk factors include commodity price fluctuations and regulatory considerations for both, with CRH carrying larger absolute debt levels and VMC exhibiting higher price-to-earnings multiples. Sector exposure remains aligned, but market sentiment has rewarded CRH’s scale advantages in recent periods while VMC trades at a premium reflecting its domestic leadership position.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, strategic catalysts including the Arcosa transaction, and relative positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI systems would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to CRH over the near term. VMC’s focused aggregates strategy and upcoming earnings provide supportive elements, yet broader revenue diversification and recent acquisition-driven visibility tilt the probabilistic assessment toward CRH. This evaluation reflects data-driven pattern recognition rather than forward-looking guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.53% price change this week, while VMC (@Construction Materials) price change was -3.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.
CRH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
VMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| CRH | VMC | CRH / VMC | |
| Capitalization | 68.6B | 38B | 181% |
| EBITDA | 7.81B | 2.38B | 328% |
| Gain YTD | -17.110 | 3.050 | -561% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.06 | 34.69 | 55% |
| Revenue | 38.1B | 8.06B | 473% |
| Total Cash | 3.24B | 140M | 2,314% |
| Total Debt | 20.4B | 5.09B | 401% |
CRH | VMC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRH's Valuation (26) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VMC (78). This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than VMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as VMC (27). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to VMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's SMR Rating (53) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as VMC (62). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to VMC’s over the last 12 months.
VMC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (59). This means that VMC’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as VMC (60). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to VMC’s over the last 12 months.
| CRH | VMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 6 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VMC has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VMC jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMC | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| MLM - VMC | 87% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| EXP - VMC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| CRH - VMC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| TTAM - VMC | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| AMRZ - VMC | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||