Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIAX vs FSMDX
CRIAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CRIAX vs FSMDX
CRIAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIAX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. CRIAX (174M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CRIAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs CRIAX (0.43). CRIAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CRIAX (22 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CRIAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CRIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIAX: FSMDX (0) vs CRIAX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. CRIAX (11.84). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. CRIAX (-13.44).
| CRIAX | FSMDX | CRIAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.03 | 4,080% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.03 | 4,080% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.640 | 13.837 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 53.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.75 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 13.26 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.83 | 56.18 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.44 | 40.31 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.73 | 167.00 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers