Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIAX vs FSMDX
CRIAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CRIAX vs FSMDX
CRIAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. CRIAX (169M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CRIAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs CRIAX (0.44). CRIAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CRIAX (22 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CRIAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CRIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIAX: FSMDX (0) vs CRIAX (1000000). CRIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.53 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. CRIAX (-16.13).
| CRIAX | FSMDX | CRIAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.03 | 4,080% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.03 | 4,080% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.412 | 11.996 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.99 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.53 | 22.46 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.72 | 59.36 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.13 | 42.72 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.59 | 166.70 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement