Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIEX vs FSMDX
CRIEX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CRIEX vs FSMDX
CRIEX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIEX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIEX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. CRIEX (19.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CRIEX: FSMDX (0.99) vs CRIEX (0.00). CRIEX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CRIEX (20 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CRIEX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CRIEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIEX: FSMDX (0) vs CRIEX (1000000). CRIEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.87 vs. FSMDX (22.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. CRIEX (-9.06).
| CRIEX | FSMDX | CRIEX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.03 | 5,400% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.148 | 11.996 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.7M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.87 | 22.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.85 | 59.36 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.06 | 42.72 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.59 | 166.70 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement