Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIEX vs FSMDX
CRIEX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts CRIEX vs FSMDX
CRIEX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIEX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIEX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. CRIEX (18.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than CRIEX: FSMDX (0.75) vs CRIEX (0.00). CRIEX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: CRIEX (20 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). CRIEX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). CRIEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIEX: FSMDX (0) vs CRIEX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. CRIEX (5.64). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. CRIEX (-8.25).
| CRIEX | FSMDX | CRIEX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.03 | 5,400% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.577 | 13.837 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.7M | 53.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 13.26 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.03 | 56.18 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.25 | 40.31 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.35 | 167.00 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers