Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FSSNX
CRISX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FSSNX
CRISX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. CRISX (70.8M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FSSNX (1.05) vs CRISX (0.70). CRISX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CRISX (29 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. CRISX (38.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRISX: FSSNX (0) vs CRISX (1000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. CRISX (9.70). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. CRISX (4.67).
| CRISX | FSSNX | CRISX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 4,320% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.03 | 4,320% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.881 | 17.495 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8M | 34.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.05 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.70 | 20.98 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 62.87 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.67 | 36.23 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.77 | 140.89 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement