Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$17.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.98M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.04
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. CRISX (68M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FTHFX (0.70) vs CRISX (0.37). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. CRISX (-1.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 105.84 vs. CRISX (34.34).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.283 | 10.436 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68M | 11.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.70 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.99 | 5.94 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.89 | 56.57 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.34 | 105.84 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.29 | 178.76 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement