Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$16.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.94M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.48
Change+$0.29 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.65B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. CRISX (64.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FTHFX (0.74) vs CRISX (0.40). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. CRISX (-3.95). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 85.78 vs. CRISX (20.73).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.285 | 3.897 | -161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.9M | 10.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 4.25 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.37 | 40.63 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.73 | 85.78 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.17 | 149.94 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers