Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$16.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.31M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CRISX (63.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FTHFX (0.70) vs CRISX (0.38). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. CRISX (-14.31). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. CRISX (8.19).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.700 | 6.957 | -68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.3M | 10.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.70 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.31 | -5.11 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.08 | 36.76 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.19 | 79.21 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.23 | 159.87 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers